feedback

feedback is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from IncommensurableHubris/fullstack-director. It costs 201 tokens per session (1,247 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A procedure for recording problems caused by a shared development framework in a feedback ledger. The ledger is used to pass those findings back to the framework's maintainers.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a framework rule, template, gate, or routing decision blocks work or sends the task in the wrong direction.
Why use it?
It helps separate framework problems from bugs in the project using it. That makes the right team responsible for fixing the issue and preserves evidence for later review.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/feedback
Any agent
npx skills add IncommensurableHubris/fullstack-director --skill feedback
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IncommensurableHubris/fullstack-director

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for feedback

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/feedback.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/feedback)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/incommensurablehubris/fullstack-director/feedback.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 201 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,247 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00201 $0.01247
Opus 5 $0.00101 $0.00624
Sonnet 5 $0.00040 $0.00249
Haiku 4.5 $0.00020 $0.00125

Measured 3d ago against content hash 76fccba1afd1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/feedback/SKILL.md · 61 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

feedback · Capture framework friction — a sixty-second detour, then back to work

A cross-cutting activity (prefix-less, like status): the capture half of the framework's dogfood→distill→upstream loop (shared/feedback-loop.md — read it once; this skill is its clerical arm). You run in a consumer repo. The finding you write here is triaged later in the framework's master repo — you never fix vendored files yourself (upstream-first).

The one routing test — before writing anything

Where would the fix land?

  • In the vendored framework (.agents/skills/**, .claude/skills/**, shared/**, tools/vendor.py, a gate/template/protocol) → this skill. Continue below.
  • In this project's own code or realizations → a product bug: the normal chain owns it (/05-reviewer findings → /04-builder), not the ledger.
  • In this project's spine (a requirement/constraint is wrong) → the amendment protocol (shared/spec-amendment-protocol.md), not the ledger.
  • Genuinely unsure → ledger it (severity: friction-only, say so in actual:) — a mis-filed entry costs one triage minute; a lost one costs the fix.

The procedure (do all five, in order)

  1. Stamp. Read source_commit from .director/vendor-manifest.json. Absent/unreadable → use unknown (pre-manifest vendor) and note that a re-sync will fix stamping.
  2. Number. Read docs/framework-feedback.md; next id = max(FB-NNN) + 1, zero-padded (none yet → FB-001). If the ledger file itself is absent, create it first from the template in shared/feedback-loop.md §1.
  3. Fill the entry — every field, per the ledger's own template: framework: (the SHA from step 1) · harness: (the one you are running on: claude-code | codex | gemini-cli) · seat: (00-discoverystatus, or shared / vendor) · severity: (blocks-gate — a gate/verdict was wrong or unreachable · wrong-but-recoverable — incorrect output you corrected · friction-only — worked, but cost real time) · expected: / actual: (the load-bearing pair — a mood is not a finding) · repro: (minimal steps or the exact command) · artifact: (the transcript / diff / report path that shows it) · status: open.
  4. Append the entry to the end of docs/framework-feedback.md. Append-only: never edit or renumber an existing entry (supersede with a new one that names it), never compact the ledger. (2026-07-28) The status: line is the one exception, and it is not yours to write. The master repo sets it at sync time — resolved-in <sha>, or deferred-in <sha> (trigger: …) when triage acknowledged the entry but did not action it, sometimes with a landed-as: line when the fix differed from what you proposed. So: a deferred-in entry is not ignored — keep your workaround until its stated trigger fires; and an entry still reading open after a sync means it was not disposed, which is worth raising. Never set your own status beyond the initial open.
  5. Confirm + resume. Tell the user the id (logged FB-007) in one line and return to the interrupted work — this skill is a detour, never a takeover. If you hot-patched a vendored file to unblock (the emergency escape hatch), the entry is blocks-gate and actual: describes the patch.

Read the full file on GitHub · 61 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 61 lines · 201 tokens per session scan A 76fccba1afd1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository IncommensurableHubris/fullstack-director (5 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 201 tokens to every session and 1,247 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

spec-kitty-charter-doctrine

Run charter interview, generation, context, and sync workflows for project governance in Spec Kitty 3.x. Access doctrine artifacts programmatically via DoctrineService. Resolve agent profiles. Load action-scoped governance context iteratively, not all at once. Triggers: "interview for charter", "generate charter"…

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 135 tokens

spec-kitty-spdd-reasons

Drive REASONS Canvas authoring and review for Spec Kitty missions that opted in to Structured-Prompt-Driven Development (SPDD) via charter selection. Triggers: "use SPDD", "use REASONS", "generate a REASONS canvas", "apply structured prompt driven development", "make this mission SPDD". Does NOT handle: enforcing SPDD…

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 118 tokens

conductor-implement

Executes the tasks defined in the specified track's plan. Use this to start or continue working on a feature, bug fix, or chore.

gemini-cli-extensions/conductor · 34 tokens

dependency-upgrade

Plan, batch, and verify dependency upgrades safely. Triages outdated packages into risk tiers, upgrades in order (dev/minor/patch first, runtime majors last), verifies each batch, and produces an auditable commit sequence. Use when asked to "upgrade deps", "bump packages", "update nodemodules", "fix vulnerabilities"…

open-gsd/gsd-pi · 90 tokens

forensics

Post-mortem a failed GSD auto-mode run. Traces symptom to root cause via .gsd/ activity, journal, metrics, and lock artifacts, producing a filing-ready bug report with file:line refs and a fix suggestion. Use when asked to "forensics", "post-mortem", "why did auto-mode fail", "trace the stuck loop", "debug the crash"…

open-gsd/gsd-pi · 112 tokens

review

Review code changes for security, performance, bugs, and quality. Reviews staged changes, unstaged changes, specific commits, or PR-ready diffs.

open-gsd/gsd-pi · 32 tokens