benefriches: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/security-review/SKILL.md

security-review is a skill for Claude Code from incubateur-ademe/benefriches. It costs 30 tokens per session (669 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-security audit covering login and access controls, user input, stored secrets, dependencies, and APIs. It reviews selected files or recent changes against the project's security rules.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for a full pre-deployment security check or to examine specific files and recent code changes.
Why use it?
It helps find common weaknesses such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, exposed secrets, unsafe command execution, and missing access checks before deployment.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is incubateur-ademe/benefriches's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on benefriches itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything benefriches configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to incubateur-ademe/benefriches. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/incubateur-ademe/benefriches/main/.agents/skills/security-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/incubateur-ademe/benefriches

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/incubateur-ademe/benefriches/security-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/incubateur-ademe/benefriches/security-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/incubateur-ademe/benefriches/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/incubateur-ademe/benefriches/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/incubateur-ademe/benefriches/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/incubateur-ademe/benefriches/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 669 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.00669
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00268
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00134
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00067

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 3c7fa84941f6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/security-review/SKILL.md · 110 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Review

Perform a comprehensive security audit of code changes or specified files.

Instructions

1. Determine Scope

If $ARGUMENTS provided, review those specific files/directories. Otherwise, review recent changes with git diff (or git diff HEAD~1 if no uncommitted changes).

2. Load Security Rules

Read .claude/context/security/security-rules.md for the complete security checklist.

3. Run Automated Scans

# Dependency vulnerabilities
pnpm -r audit

With Grep, run the secret patterns of security-rules.md section 1 (with its exclusions) and every row of its "Pattern scan" table over the scope.

4. Apply Security Rules

Check the scoped code against each section of security-rules.md: Benefriches' known weak spots and where each control lives. Then apply general OWASP Top 10 knowledge to anything it doesn't cover.

5. Report Format

For each finding:

### [SEVERITY] Finding Title

**File:** path/to/file.ts:line
**Category:** OWASP A0X - Category Name
**Description:** What the vulnerability is
**Impact:** What could happen if exploited
**Remediation:** How to fix it

// Vulnerable code
<code snippet>

// Fixed code
<code snippet>

Severity Levels:

  • CRITICAL: Exploitable vulnerabilities, data exposure, auth bypass
  • HIGH: Security weaknesses requiring immediate attention
  • MEDIUM: Defense-in-depth improvements
  • LOW: Best practice recommendations

6. Summary

End with:

## Security Review Summary

### Scan Results
- Dependency Audit: X vulnerabilities (X critical, X high, X moderate)
- Secret Scan: X potential secrets found
- Pattern Scan: X suspicious patterns

### Findings by Severity
- Critical: X
- High: X
- Medium: X
- Low: X

### Verdict

✅ **PASS** - No critical or high severity issues
⚠️ **REVIEW NEEDED** - Medium issues require attention before production
❌ **BLOCK** - Critical/high issues must be fixed before deployment

Pre-Deployment Checklist

Read the full file on GitHub · 110 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · -27 lines 3c7fa84941f6
  2. 1mo ago Changed 12817c6f62be
  3. 2mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A f666a735629a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository incubateur-ademe/benefriches (45 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 669 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens