Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add indranildchandra/claude-local-starter --skill review-councilgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/indranildchandra/claude-local-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/indranildchandra/claude-local-starter/review-council)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/indranildchandra/claude-local-starter/review-council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/indranildchandra/claude-local-starter/review-council/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/indranildchandra/claude-local-starter/review-council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/indranildchandra/claude-local-starter/review-council.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01643 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00822 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
review-council scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Council Protocol
Token budget — read this first
Load personas on demand, never all at once.
- There are 20+ persona files. Loading all of them would consume the entire context window.
- In Phase 2 you select 3–6 personas. Load only those files — nothing else.
- Each persona subagent receives only: its own persona file + domain profile + scope brief. No other context.
- Subagents run in isolation — they do not inherit the parent session's full context.
- Persona outputs returned to the parent are compressed (max 300 words each).
- If you find yourself loading more than 6 persona files, stop and reduce the council size.
Overview
The council reviews code, architecture, or design decisions using independent expert personas that debate, challenge each other, and converge on a verdict. The human engineer is an active participant, not a passive recipient.
Minimum council size: 3 personas. Council size by complexity:
simple(single component, low risk): 3 personasmedium(cross-cutting feature, moderate risk): 4–5 personascomplex(system-level, high risk, multiple teams): 5–6 personas
Always include at least one of: staff-engineer, cloud-cost-architect, appsec-architect — cost and security angles must be represented in every council.
Phase 0 — Scope + Early Human Input
- If
/design-reviewwas called with a scope argument, use it as-is. - If no argument: run a quick repo scan (1 Haiku subagent,
gitnexus ctx_searchor file glob) to identify the highest-risk or most recently changed area. Propose this as scope. - Present to human and ask:
- "Does this scope look right, or do you want to focus elsewhere?"
- "What concerns you most about this? Any known constraints (deadline, regulatory, performance budget)?"
- "Any personas you want added or removed from the council?"
- Record answers verbatim as the Phase 0 Human Brief — this shapes everything downstream.
- If the user requests a persona not in
standard-personas/: generate it using the schema inuser-generated-personas/README.md, save it touser-generated-personas/<name>.mdglobally, then use it in this session.
What ships with it
22 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- .DS_Store 8.0 KB
- standard-personas/accessibility-engineer.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/ai-architect.md 1.4 KB
- standard-personas/ai-engineering-manager.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/api-architect.md 1.1 KB
- standard-personas/appsec-architect.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/cloud-cost-architect.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/data-architect.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/data-scientist.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/devops-platform-engineer.md 1.1 KB
- standard-personas/lead-product-manager.md 1.5 KB
- standard-personas/lead-sdet.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/ml-engineer.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/mlops-engineer.md 1.2 KB
- standard-personas/product-designer.md 1.4 KB
- standard-personas/senior-backend-engineer.md 1.1 KB
- standard-personas/senior-engineering-manager.md 1.3 KB
- standard-personas/senior-frontend-engineer.md 1.2 KB
- standard-personas/staff-engineer.md 1.2 KB
- standard-personas/threat-modeller.md 1.4 KB
- standard-personas/ui-ux-designer.md 1.1 KB
- user-generated-personas/README.md 1.7 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 172 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 1c45edf1fb58
review-council is a skill published in the GitHub repository indranildchandra/claude-local-starter (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,643 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-is
Audit a design against Dieter Rams' ten "Good design is..." principles, then hand off a /make-plan prompt for one of three outcomes — new design, refine design, or redesign. Use when the user says "audit this design", "design review", "check this UI against Rams", "is this UI good", "critique this design", "design…
critique-theater
Five-dimension design quality review — score the artifact against craft, brand, accessibility, and copy, then fix what falls short before handing it over.
ss-lint
Quick automated lint — detects common design system violations in seconds.
nw-fp-usable-design
Naming conventions, API ergonomics, and usability patterns for functional code.
code-quality-principles
Applies KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles for clean code with reduced complexity. Use when refactoring or reviewing code for over-engineering.
ss-review
Review UI code for design system compliance, accessibility, and best practices.