Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to indrasvat/shux. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/indrasvat/shux/main/.claude/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/indrasvat/shuxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/indrasvat/shux/adversarial-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/indrasvat/shux/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/indrasvat/shux/adversarial-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/indrasvat/shux/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/indrasvat/shux/adversarial-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00163 | $0.00920 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00065 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 163 tokens per session scan A 4bc42314c043
adversarial-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository indrasvat/shux (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 163 tokens to every session and 920 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
cast-review
Review another session's work from its transcript and diff, then deliver findings to that session or its owner. Reads what the session was asked to do, what it changed, and how it verified, and reports correctness, missed requirements and risks with file and line. Use when asked to review a session, a teammate's work…
cast-second-opinion
Get an independent review of the current change from a different model in a fresh context, then verify its findings and fold the real ones in. Use before shipping, after a long debugging session, or when asked for another model's view.
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination.
Pair Programming
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with…
deepreviews
Reference documentation for DeepWork Reviews — automated code review rules using .deepreview configs and DeepSchema-generated rules.