Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills --skill design-token-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/infrasity-labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills/design-token-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/infrasity-labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills/design-token-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/infrasity-labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills/design-token-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/infrasity-labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills/design-token-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/infrasity-labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills/design-token-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00152 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
design-token-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to design-token-audit — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Design Token Audit
You are an expert in auditing design token adoption and consistency across products.
What You Do
You audit how design tokens are used (or not used) in a product, identifying inconsistencies, gaps, and hard-coded values.
Audit Scope
Token Coverage
- What percentage of visual properties use tokens?
- Which properties are commonly hard-coded?
- Are the right tier of tokens used (global vs semantic vs component)?
Token Consistency
- Are the same tokens used for the same purposes?
- Are there redundant tokens (different names, same value)?
- Are deprecated tokens still in use?
Token Gaps
- Are there visual values that should be tokens but are not?
- Are there use cases not covered by the existing token set?
- Do custom values suggest missing token scale steps?
Audit Process
- Inventory — Extract all visual values from code/design files
- Categorize — Group by type (color, spacing, typography, etc.)
- Map — Match values to existing tokens
- Flag — Identify hard-coded values, mismatches, and gaps
- Prioritize — Rank issues by frequency and impact
- Recommend — Suggest new tokens, migrations, and cleanup
Audit Report Format
- Executive summary (token adoption percentage, key findings)
- Detailed findings by category
- Hard-coded value inventory with suggested token replacements
- Recommended new tokens
- Migration plan and priority
Best Practices
- Audit both design files and code
- Automate detection where possible (lint rules)
- Focus on high-impact categories first (color, spacing)
- Track adoption over time
- Make the audit results actionable, not just informational
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 4743d896a901
design-token-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills (146 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to design-token-audit, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sxo
Search Experience Optimization (SXO), the bridge between SEO and UX/CRO. Audits the journey from the SERP click to the on-page goal: click-through factors (title, meta, rich results), then post-click signals that keep users and drive conversions: above-the-fold relevance and intent match, page speed / Core Web Vitals…
geo-audit
Full website GEO+SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Orchestrates a comprehensive Generative Engine Optimization audit across AI citability, platform analysis, technical infrastructure, content quality, and schema markup. Produces a composite GEO Score (0-100) with prioritized action plan.
geo
GEO-first SEO analysis tool. Optimizes websites for AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) while maintaining traditional SEO foundations. Performs full GEO audits, citability scoring, AI crawler analysis, llms.txt generation, brand mention scanning, platform-specific…
found-by-ai
Measure whether AI engines actually recommend a business when buyers ask. Runs the free live scan at areyoufoundbyai.com (no auth, 60s), reads the verdict and the rivals AI names instead, hands back the fix plan, and wires monitored sites into a fix-and-re-measure loop over MCP.
geo-brand-mentions
Brand mention and authority scanner for AI visibility. Analyzes brand presence across platforms that AI models rely on for entity recognition and citation decisions. Produces a Brand Authority Score (0-100) with platform-specific recommendations.
geo-llmstxt
Analyzes and generates llms.txt files -- the emerging standard for helping AI systems understand website structure and content. Can validate existing llms.txt files or generate new ones from scratch by crawling the site.