Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/infraspecdev/tesseract/github-actions-reviewernpx skills add infraspecdev/tesseract --skill github-actions-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/infraspecdev/tesseractWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00858 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00429 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
github-actions-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Actions Reviewer
Overview
Structured review of GitHub Actions workflows for consistency, security, and operational best practices.
Core principle: Workflows in the same repo form a system. Review them as a group, not individually — inconsistencies between workflows cause the hardest-to-debug CI failures.
When to Use
- Reviewing CI/CD workflows in any repository
- Auditing workflow permissions and security posture
- Checking for version drift across workflows
- After adding a new workflow to verify consistency with existing ones
- Periodic hygiene check on GitHub Actions setup
- Re-grading after improvements (creates fresh analysis and plan)
When NOT to Use
- Debugging a single workflow run failure (use GitHub's run logs instead)
- Writing new workflows from scratch (this skill reviews existing ones)
- Non-GitHub CI systems (Jenkins, GitLab CI, CircleCI)
- Reviewing application code that happens to be triggered by workflows
Workflow
Read All Workflows + Config -> Evaluate Against Checklist -> Write analysis.md -> Write plan.md -> Ask User to Confirm -> (proceed: Execute / stop: Done / edit: revise plan.md)
Critical Rules
- ALWAYS write analysis.md and plan.md — Even on re-reviews or when no issues found. Never skip file output.
- ALWAYS ask user before executing — Never auto-proceed to implementation.
- Show the user what was written — Summarize key findings after writing files.
Steps
1. Read All Workflows and Config
Read every file in .github/workflows/ plus related config: release tooling configs (release-please-config.json, .releaserc.json, etc.), versions.tf, .tflint.hcl, package.json.
2. Evaluate Against Checklist
Run through the 8-point checklist covering version consistency, plugin/config alignment, permissions, concurrency control, path filters, reusable patterns, action pinning, and secrets handling. See checklist.md for detailed criteria, examples, and red flags.
3. Write analysis.md
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 80 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 2c0b8d99aebe
github-actions-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository infraspecdev/tesseract (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 858 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
multi-agent-release-manager
Cleans up the workspace, formats code, runs presubmit checks, and uploads CLs to Gerrit.
dsh-web-pre-push-checks
Use before pushing, opening or updating a pull request, or claiming dsh-web checks pass. Selects the required repository gates and diff-specific generation, build, and GUI evidence.
babysit
Same-session monitoring loop for PRs, CI runs, tickets, and deployments using the monitorstart / monitorupdate / autonudgestop MCP tools. The loop re-injects your check instructions into THIS session on an idle interval — same context, same tools — and works from dashboard chat, Slack threads, and Discord DMs. Use…
azsdk-common-pipeline-analysis
Analyze Azure SDK CI/CD pipeline failures into a structured diagnosis, and define the required output format. Load this skill before calling azsdkanalyzepipeline, which returns raw failure data that this skill interprets and formats. USE FOR: "pipeline failed", "build failure", "CI check failing", "tests failing in…
harness-setup
HAR: Project init, tool setup, agent config, memory setup, skill mirror sync. Trigger: setup, init, new project, CI/Codex setup, harness-mem, mirror. Do NOT load for: implementation, review, release, planning.
managing-github-actions-secrets
Creates and updates GitHub Actions secrets for PostHog workflows. Use when adding a new CI secret, rotating an existing secret, wiring a workflow to an API token, package registry credential, deploy key, or any value referenced via ${{ secrets. }} in .github/workflows/.