Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add infraspecdev/tesseract --skill summarizegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/infraspecdev/tesseractWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/infraspecdev/tesseract/summarize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/infraspecdev/tesseract/summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/infraspecdev/tesseract/summarize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/infraspecdev/tesseract/summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/infraspecdev/tesseract/summarize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00889 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00356 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
summarize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phase Summarize
Output Path — MANDATORY
Write the summary using the Write tool to exactly this path:
{output_dir}/{feature}/summary/{N}-{slug}/summary.md
Where {output_dir} comes from .shield.json output_dir field (default docs/shield), {feature} is the feature folder name ({feature-name}-YYYYMMDD), {N} is a sequential number, and {slug} is a short kebab-case descriptor (e.g., 1-research, 2-plan-review). Do NOT use any other path, filename, or directory. The Write tool creates directories automatically.
After writing, update {output_dir}/manifest.json and regenerate {output_dir}/index.html.
When to Use
Called automatically by each phase's orchestrator at the end of execution. Not invoked directly by users.
Input
The orchestrator passes:
phase_name: The pipeline phase that just completed (research, plan, plan-review, sync, implement-step-N, review-step-N, final-review)phase_output: Structured data about what was doneproject_name: From.shield.jsonrun_id: The current run identifier (date-topic)
Process
- Format the phase output as concise bullet points (5-10 bullets max)
- Include: what was done, key decisions made, findings if any, next phase
- Write to
{output_dir}/{feature}/summary/{N}-{slug}/summary.md - Return the summary text to the orchestrator for display
Summary Format
# <Phase Name> Summary
**Run:** <run_id>
**Date:** <timestamp>
## What was done
- Bullet 1
- Bullet 2
## Key decisions
- Decision 1 (if any)
## Findings
- Finding 1 (if any review findings)
## Next
- What the next phase will do
Plan Summary Template
When phase_name is plan, replace the generic "What was done" bullets with the plan-specific template below. Read the sidecar at {output_dir}/{feature}/plan.json to populate the structural counts.
# Plan Summary
**Run:** <run_id>
**Date:** <timestamp>
## What was done
- **Plan:** <plan name> (<phase>)
- **Milestones (N):** M1 Login core; M2 Password recovery (depends on M1); …
_(Omit this bullet entirely when `sidecar.milestones` is empty.)_
_(For each milestone: `<id> <name>`. Append ` (depends on <id1>, <id2>)` only when depends_on is non-empty.)_
- **Epics:** N epic(s) — <Epic-1 name>, <Epic-2 name>, …
- **Stories:** N total (N ready, N in-progress, N done)
- Architecture doc and detailed execution plan written to <relative path>
## Key decisions
- Decision 1 (if any)
## Next
- Suggested next step (e.g., /plan-review, /pm-sync)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 4ea35a607abc
summarize is a skill published in the GitHub repository infraspecdev/tesseract (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 889 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Optimize the meaningful UI available immediately from a Next.js route on an initial load (hard navigation) or named client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route and entry point at a time; the shipped test then guards…