Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ingjaviergomezm/el-camello --skill doc-coauthoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ingjaviergomezm/el-camelloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingjaviergomezm/el-camello/doc-coauthoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingjaviergomezm/el-camello/doc-coauthoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingjaviergomezm/el-camello/doc-coauthoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingjaviergomezm/el-camello/doc-coauthoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingjaviergomezm/el-camello/doc-coauthoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.02553 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00511 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00255 |
Grade A, and why
doc-coauthoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to doc-coauthoring — 131 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 265 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Doc Co-Authoring Workflow
This skill provides a structured workflow for guiding users through collaborative document creation. Act as an active guide, walking users through three stages: Context Gathering, Refinement & Structure, and Reader Testing.
When to Offer This Workflow
Trigger conditions:
- User mentions writing documentation: "write a doc", "draft a proposal", "create a spec", "write up"
- User mentions specific doc types: "PRD", "design doc", "decision doc", "RFC"
- User seems to be starting a substantial writing task
Initial offer: Offer the user a structured workflow for co-authoring the document. Explain the three stages:
- Context Gathering: User provides all relevant context while Claude asks clarifying questions
- Refinement & Structure: Iteratively build each section through brainstorming and editing
- Reader Testing: Test the doc with a fresh Claude (no context) to catch blind spots before others read it
Explain that this approach helps ensure the doc works well when others read it (including when they paste it into Claude). Ask if they want to try this workflow or prefer to work freeform.
If user declines, work freeform. If user accepts, proceed to Stage 1.
Stage 1: Context Gathering
Goal: Close the gap between what the user knows and what Claude knows, enabling smart guidance later.
Initial Questions
Start by asking the user for meta-context about the document:
- What type of document is this? (e.g., technical spec, decision doc, proposal)
- Who's the primary audience?
- What's the desired impact when someone reads this?
- Is there a template or specific format to follow?
- Any other constraints or context to know?
Inform them they can answer in shorthand or dump information however works best for them.
If user provides a template or mentions a doc type:
- Ask if they have a template document to share
- If they provide a link to a shared document, use the appropriate integration to fetch it
- If they provide a file, read it
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 265 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 6b1ca336366f
doc-coauthoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository ingjaviergomezm/el-camello (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,553 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to doc-coauthoring, differing in 131 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
foundry-hosted-agent-validation
Step-by-step process for validating a Python Foundry hosted agent sample (under python/samples/04-hosting/foundry-hosted-agents/) end to end — running it locally (native runtime and azd ai agent run) and after deploying it to an Azure AI Foundry project with azd. Use this when asked to validate a hosted agent sample.
papyrus-latex-suggestions
Propose actual inline replacement text (old → new) as accept/reject suggestions — LaTeX "suggesting mode" / track changes — that render directly in the PDF. Use when the author wants concrete edit proposals they can see and accept or reject. For remarks ABOUT the text (notes, not replacements), use…
pptx-maker
Generate or restyle a PowerPoint deck. Use when the user wants to create or edit a .pptx presentation, build slides from text or a URL, or design a reusable slide style.
paper-figures
Extract figures from downloaded papers and include them in survey/review reports. Use when the report covers other groups' work and benefits from their architecture diagrams, experimental plots, or system schematics. Your brain prompt supplies the absolute path to the extract-figures script as {{EXTRACTFIGURES}} — use…
moai-docs-generation
Documentation generation patterns for technical specs, API docs, user guides, and knowledge bases using real tools like Sphinx, MkDocs, TypeDoc, and Nextra. Use when creating docs from code, building doc sites, or automating documentation workflows.
nw-diagram
Generates C4 architecture diagrams (context, container, component) in Mermaid or PlantUML. Use when creating or updating architecture visualizations.