Irrlicht: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/ir:code-review/SKILL.md

ir:code-review is a skill for Claude Code from ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht. It costs 152 tokens per session (2,350 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A repository-aware review of the changes in a Git working diff. A Git diff is the record of code added, changed, or removed since a chosen starting point.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing local changes at different effort levels, checking repository conventions, verifying suspected problems, and recommending a human review for large or risky changes.
Why use it?
It looks for defects in the actual change and checks the project's own rules, while reporting the most serious findings first.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions AGENTS.md.

This is ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on Irrlicht itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything Irrlicht configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht/main/.claude/skills/ir:code-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ir:code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ir:code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 152 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,350 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00152 $0.02350
Opus 5.5 $0.00061 $0.00940
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00030 $0.00470
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00235

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 920365ba0b56, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ir:code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/ir:code-review/SKILL.md · 171 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review the Working Diff

/ir:code-review [effort] [base]
Argument Values Default
effort low · medium · high · xhigh · max medium
base any git diff spec origin/main...HEAD

Both are positional and both optional: /ir:code-review, /ir:code-review high, and /ir:code-review low origin/main...HEAD are all valid. A bare effort word is an effort, never a PR number — this skill reviews a local diff and never takes a PR argument.

Why this skill exists

The built-in /code-review is marked disable-model-invocation: the Skill tool refuses it and it cannot be reached from Bash either. It is a human-triggered path. That left ir:exec's review gate unrunnable (#1205), so this is the repo's own reviewer — same job, agent-invocable, and aware of conventions in AGENTS.md that a general-purpose reviewer wouldn't check.

It is not a replacement for the real thing. For a large or risky diff, a human running /code-review <tier> origin/main...HEAD — or /code-review ultra for the cloud multi-agent pass — is still the stronger review, and recommending that is a legitimate outcome of this skill.

1 · Resolve the diff

git fetch origin main                      # refresh the base before diffing
git diff --stat <base>                     # scope
git diff <base>                            # the review surface

This skill already defaults to origin/main...HEAD. Keep it — inside a worktree, both of the defaults you'd otherwise reach for by hand mislead: the local main ref is stale (never updated when other PRs merge, so main...HEAD drags in already-merged hunks), and once the branch has been pushed with git push -u, @{upstream}...HEAD is ~empty (upstream now points at the pushed branch, so it reviews nothing). origin/main...HEAD after a fetch is the honest surface.

Review only what the diff changed, plus whatever the change puts at risk. An unrelated pre-existing wart is not a finding.

Read the full file on GitHub · 171 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 920365ba0b56
  2. 1mo ago Changed · -3 tokens per session 9366bb0dc45d
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 163 lines · 155 tokens per session scan A c7f73a023b8c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ir:code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht (101 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 152 tokens to every session and 2,350 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pr

Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode · 47 tokens

merge-batch

Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.

diegosouzapw/OmniRoute · 46 tokens

otto-pr-review-loop

Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.

omnigent-ai/omnigent · 17 tokens

engram-branch-pr

PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.

Gentleman-Programming/engram · 37 tokens

github-contributor

A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.

daymade/claude-code-skills · 105 tokens

revdiff

Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…

umputun/revdiff · 248 tokens