Irrlicht: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/ir:doc-review/SKILL.md

ir:doc-review is a skill for Claude Code from ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht. It costs 117 tokens per session (2,895 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A documentation audit that checks project docs for clarity, completeness, and correctness using fixed pass-or-fail rules, then applies the fixes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Auditing guides, reference pages, and other project documentation; finding issues with quotes, locations, severity, and stable IDs; and correcting verified problems in place.
Why use it?
It replaces subjective review with repeatable checks and reduces the chance that known documentation problems remain unresolved.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents.

This is ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on Irrlicht itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything Irrlicht configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht/main/.claude/skills/ir:doc-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ir:doc-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-doc-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-doc-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-doc-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-doc-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ir:doc-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-doc-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingo-eichhorst/irrlicht/ir-doc-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 117 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,895 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00117 $0.02895
Opus 5 $0.00059 $0.01448
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00579
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00290

Measured 11d ago against content hash a4ac206f3686, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ir:doc-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/ir:doc-review/SKILL.md · 188 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

ir:doc-review — Objective Documentation Audit

Goal: audit every in-scope documentation surface against three axes — understandability (U), completeness (C), validity (V) — and fix every finding directly, in place. Filing a GitHub issue is the fallback for the rare finding that can't be safely applied (see step 7) — it is not the default outcome of a finding.

The audit must be reproducible: every finding is binary (a named criterion failed), anchored to a verbatim quote at a location, scored by a fixed severity rubric, and stamped with a stable finding-ID. Two runs on an unchanged tree must converge on the same findings.

Two companion files define the objective parts. Read both before auditing and apply them literally — never invent criteria, never grade on subjective grounds (tone, elegance, "feels unclear"):

  • references/rubric.md — the criteria (U1–U6, C1–C4, V1–V6), the severity rubric, the finding-ID recipe, and a worked pass/fail example per criterion. This is the contract.
  • references/inventory-sources.md — the bash recipes that derive the authoritative inventories (adapters, CLI flags, env vars, routes, states, events, relay frames, version) from code each run. Axes C and V check docs against these inventories, never against memory.

Inputs

  • --report-only — run the full audit and print per-surface findings, but change nothing and file nothing. Use this first, and for the convergence check.
  • An optional path or glob — limit the audit to matching surfaces (default: all in-scope).

ir:release Step 4b runs this fix-by-default workflow on every release (#834, #837), so drift can't silently accumulate the way the stale "no hooks" claim once did.

Workflow

1. Locate the repo root and confirm gh

Work from git rev-parse --show-toplevel. Confirm the repo is ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht (gh repo view --json nameWithOwner) and gh auth status succeeds. If --report-only, the gh auth check is optional.

Read the full file on GitHub · 188 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 188 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A a4ac206f3686

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ir:doc-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ingo-eichhorst/Irrlicht (98 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 2,895 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens