Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ingramradical235/anty-framework/quest-interviewnpx skills add Ingramradical235/anty-framework --skill quest-interviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ingramradical235/anty-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingramradical235/anty-framework/quest-interview)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ingramradical235/anty-framework/quest-interview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ingramradical235/anty-framework/quest-interview.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01568 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00784 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00314 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
quest-interview scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to quest-interview — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QUEST Interview Method
When to Apply
- Onboarding conversational interview
- Gathering business context or validating assumptions
- Post-choice conversational follow-up
- When the founder's reasoning needs to be surfaced
- Any discovery conversation about the business
Core Framework
Socratic Posture
- "I am the beginner, you are the expert" — the founder knows their domain; draw it out
- Empathic neutrality — acknowledge what is said without emotional mirroring, praise, or judgment. No "That's great!" or "That must be tough." Follow with a question instead.
- One question at a time — never stack multiple questions in a single message
- Insert brief acknowledgment before each new question — no rapid-fire
Downward -> Upward Questioning
Each topic follows a two-phase pattern:
Phase 1 — Downward (establish facts):
"Tell me about your current customers."
"Who specifically is using your product today?"
"How did they find you?"
"What do they pay?"
Phase 2 — Upward (explore meaning and values):
"What does that tell you about who needs this most?"
"How does that shape your view of the ideal customer?"
"What would change if you focused entirely on that segment?"
Start with concrete facts (downward), then ascend to reasoning, values, and strategic beliefs (upward). Prevents premature abstraction.
Key Techniques
"Tell me..." Opener: For sensitive topics (failures, pivots, struggles), use "Tell me..." instead of direct questions. Lowers defensiveness, invites narrative.
Echo Questions: Reflect a key phrase back as a question to go deeper:
Founder: "We need to build trust before people buy."
Agent: "You mentioned trust. What does building trust look like
specifically in your sales process?"
Concept Identification: When founders use abstract terms ("PMF," "culture," "scale"), pause and ask them to define it concretely. Different founders mean different things by the same words.
Permission Checks: Before entering sensitive territory:
- "I'd like to explore your competitive landscape more deeply — is that something you'd like to dig into?"
- "Would it be helpful to think through your pricing strategy together?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 155 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A a192fdf15a80
quest-interview is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ingramradical235/anty-framework (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,568 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to quest-interview, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
choice-architecture
Nudge-based choice architecture for 3-option selection UI — smart default vs active choice, outcome mapping, channel factors, RECAP, operational transparency with source attribution, post-decision reinforcement, error-forgiving undo, peak-end session design, user contribution acknowledgment. Use when presenting…
confidence
Contextual confidence calibration — DEFLATE for One-Way Doors and RED zones, PROTECT for Two-Way Doors and fundraising, "How does this work step by step?" depth testing, values-to-consequences redirect, unanimity as risk signal. From Knowledge Illusion — overconfidence is sometimes functional. Use when calibrating…
culture-map
Erin Meyer's Culture Map with 8 dimensions, 5 launch presets (US, JP, DE, UK, FR), Layer A agent-user adaptation, Layer B content-target market adaptation, and anti-sycophancy tone calibration per culture. Use when adapting communication style to the founder's culture, localizing content for target markets, or when…
failure-essence
4 strategic failure patterns from Essence of Failure — dual-objective trap (conflict stress test), strategic ambiguity (operationalizability test), withdrawal decision protocol (pre-committed stop conditions, re-present biweekly), assumption provenance auditing (source, verification, load-bearing flag, sample size).…
kpi-tree
KPI tree decomposition from Goal to Drivers, formula-based factorization, impactweight assignment and dynamic update, Crux identification via importance x tractability, constraint Driver identification, input vs output metric classification. Use when decomposing Goals, prioritizing Drivers, or re-evaluating impact…
network-effects
Andrew Chen's Cold Start Problem framework — atomic network definition with thresholds by product type, anti-peanut-buttering, zero tracking, escape velocity 3-force decomposition (engagement/acquisition/economic), growth ceiling 5-force detection, competitive position dynamics, T2D3 benchmark. Use for products with…