Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Insajin/autopus-adk --skill ax-annotationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Insajin/autopus-adkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/ax-annotation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/ax-annotation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/ax-annotation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/ax-annotation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/ax-annotation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00852 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00426 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
ax-annotation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
@AX Annotation Skill
The canonical @AX rule set is emitted into this skill by the harness generator, so the tag definitions, trigger conditions, lifecycle rules, and per-file limits below are authoritative for this installation. This skill provides actionable guidance for WHEN and HOW agents apply @AX tags.
Canonical Source
Do NOT redefine tag rules elsewhere. Treat the sections of this document as the single source and apply them as written.
When to Apply @AX Tags
NOTE Triggers
Apply @AX:NOTE when you encounter:
- A magic constant with no explanation
- An exported function over 100 lines that has no godoc comment
- A business rule that is not self-evident from the code
WARN Triggers
Apply @AX:WARN (with @AX:REASON) when you detect:
- A goroutine or channel launched without a
context.Context - Cyclomatic complexity >= 15 (check with
gocycloor manual count) - Mutation of a package-level or global variable
- A function with 8 or more
ifbranches
ANCHOR Triggers
Apply @AX:ANCHOR (with @AX:REASON) when:
- A function has fan_in >= 3 callers (heuristic:
grep -r "FuncName(" . | wc -l) - Removing or renaming the symbol would break multiple consumers
TODO Triggers
Apply @AX:TODO when:
- A public function has no corresponding test file
- A SPEC requirement is referenced but not yet implemented
- An error is returned without handling (silent discard)
Application Workflow
Execute after the GREEN or REFACTOR phase of TDD:
- Scan — list all files modified in this task
- Detect triggers — for each file, check NOTE / WARN / ANCHOR / TODO conditions above
- Draft tags — prefix every agent-generated tag with
[AUTO] - Attach REASON — add
@AX:REASONimmediately after every WARN and ANCHOR tag - Count per-file — verify ANCHOR <= 3 and WARN <= 5 per file
- Handle overflow — apply overflow strategy (see below)
- Commit — include tags in the same commit as the code change
Per-File Limits and Overflow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +1 lines cece4124f402
- 10d ago First seen · 98 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A cae6daf89942
ax-annotation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Insajin/autopus-adk (111 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 852 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination.
refactoring
Safely refactor code while maintaining behavior. Use when improving code structure, reducing duplication, extracting functions, or modernizing legacy code.
cross-review
Cross-vendor code review — have a different vendor's model (DeepSeek/GLM/any OpenAI-compatible endpoint) review the current diff to catch bugs a same-vendor reviewer misses. Use after a phase is green and before commit/merge, or for a second opinion on a risky diff.
code-review
Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
autofix
Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.