Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Insajin/autopus-adk --skill competitive-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Insajin/autopus-adkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/competitive-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/competitive-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/competitive-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00791 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00396 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Competitive Analysis Skill
경쟁 환경을 구조적으로 분석하고 포지셔닝 전략을 도출하는 스킬입니다.
분석 프레임워크
1. SWOT
| 축 | 질문 |
|---|---|
| Strengths | 우리가 경쟁사보다 명확히 잘하는 것은 무엇인가? |
| Weaknesses | 현재 약점과 제약은 무엇인가? |
| Opportunities | 시장 변화가 여는 기회는 무엇인가? |
| Threats | 경쟁, 대체재, 규제가 만드는 위협은 무엇인가? |
SWOT은 항목 나열로 끝내지 않고 아래 전략으로 연결합니다.
| 전략 | 조합 | 의미 |
|---|---|---|
| SO | Strengths × Opportunities | 강점으로 기회를 확대 |
| WO | Weaknesses × Opportunities | 약점 보완 후 기회 포착 |
| ST | Strengths × Threats | 강점으로 위협 방어 |
| WT | Weaknesses × Threats | 회피 / 축소 / 집중 |
2. Competitive Landscape
| 기준 | Our Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Core Value | | | |
| Target Users | | | |
| Pricing | | | |
| Key Feature 1 | ✅/⚠️/❌ | ✅/⚠️/❌ | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
| Moat | | | |
경쟁사는 다음으로 구분합니다.
- Direct: 같은 문제를 같은 방식으로 해결
- Indirect: 같은 문제를 다른 방식으로 해결
- Potential: 인접 시장에서 진입 가능성이 큰 플레이어
3. Porter's Five Forces
| Force | 분석 질문 | 강도 |
|---|---|---|
| 경쟁자 간 경쟁 | 차별화가 낮고 경쟁자가 많은가? | Low / Med / High |
| 신규 진입 위협 | 진입 장벽이 낮은가? | Low / Med / High |
| 대체재 위협 | 다른 해결 방식이 쉬운가? | Low / Med / High |
| 공급자 교섭력 | 핵심 의존성 집중도가 높은가? | Low / Med / High |
| 구매자 교섭력 | 전환 비용이 낮은가? | Low / Med / High |
4. Battlecard
## Battlecard: Our Product vs Competitor
### Where We Win
| 영역 | 우리 | 경쟁사 | Talk Track |
### Where They Win
| 영역 | 우리 | 경쟁사 | Counter |
### Common Objections
| 반론 | 대응 |
분석 프로세스
.autopus/project/product.md와 사용자 요청에서 분석 목적을 정리합니다.- 경쟁사 목록과 비교 기준을 명시합니다.
- 웹 검색 또는 제공된 자료로 최신 근거를 수집합니다.
- SWOT, Landscape, Battlecard 중 필요한 프레임워크를 적용합니다.
- 최종적으로 차별화 포인트와 전략 액션을 3개 이내로 제안합니다.
출력 형식
## Competitive Analysis
### 범위
- 대상: {경쟁사 목록}
- 목적: {전략 수립 / 기능 비교 / 세일즈 지원}
### SWOT
{요약}
### Landscape
{비교 표}
### Key Insights
1. {핵심 인사이트}
2. {핵심 인사이트}
### Recommended Actions
1. {실행 액션}
2. {실행 액션}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 104 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A acc8f44ae92f
competitive-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository Insajin/autopus-adk (111 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 791 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
automations
Create, inspect, edit, archive, delete, run, and search scheduled or executable automation assets.
job
Execution behavior for one saved automation job running in a fresh agent conversation.
api-interface-design
Use when designing public APIs, module boundaries, provider adapters, tool schemas, or data contracts.
Using OmniForge Framework
Primary guide for using OmniForge CLI, MCP Server, workflows, and agent skills effectively.
github-release-management
Comprehensive GitHub release orchestration with AI swarm coordination for automated versioning, testing, deployment, and rollback management.
windows-deployment
Deploy FastAPI + React/Vite apps to Windows Server with NSSM services, reverse proxy (IIS or nginx), and git-pull workflow. Use when deploying any web app to a Windows prod server, setting up NSSM services, configuring IIS or nginx reverse proxy, making code environment-aware for dev/prod, or troubleshooting prod…