planning

planning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Insajin/autopus-adk. It costs 12 tokens per session (1,046 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for planning software features and turning requests into clear requirements. It uses EARS, a plain format for stating what a system must do under specific conditions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define feature scope, write conditional requirements, map user flows, identify failures such as invalid input or network errors, and set acceptance criteria.
Why use it?
It helps teams remove ambiguity, identify edge cases, and connect implementation work to measurable goals.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to define feature scope, write conditional requirements, map user flows, identify failures such as invalid input or network errors, and set acceptance criteria.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/insajin/autopus-adk/planning
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Insajin/autopus-adk --skill planning
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Insajin/autopus-adk

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for planning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/planning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/planning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for planning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 12 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,046 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00012 $0.01046
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00523
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00209
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00105

Measured 5d ago against content hash 125e8d2f851c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.omp/skills/planning/SKILL.md · 122 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Planning Skill

새로운 기능을 기획하고 요구사항을 분석하는 스킬입니다.

기획 프로세스

1단계: 목표 명확화

사용자의 요청을 분석하여 핵심 목표를 도출합니다:

  • What: 무엇을 만들 것인가?
  • Why: 왜 필요한가?
  • Who: 누구를 위한 것인가?
  • When: 언제 필요한가?

1.5단계: 시각 설명 구성

요구사항을 쓰기 전에 사용자에게 보여줄 Visual Brief를 구성합니다:

  • 워크플로우/상태 전이/의사결정이 핵심이면 Mermaid flowchart를 사용합니다.
  • 화면이나 사용자 조작이 핵심이면 저충실도 텍스트 wireframe을 사용합니다.
  • UI가 없는 CLI/API/백엔드 작업이면 sequence/data-flow/command-flow 다이어그램을 사용합니다.
  • Visual Brief는 설명 보조 자료입니다. 요구사항과 인수 기준에는 Outcome Lock에 연결된 항목만 반영합니다.

2단계: 요구사항 분석

EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) 형식으로 요구사항을 작성합니다:

  • WHERE 조건이 발생할 때, THE SYSTEM SHALL 동작을 수행해야 한다
  • WHILE 상태에 있는 동안, THE SYSTEM SHALL 동작을 수행해야 한다
  • WHEN 트리거 조건이 발생하면, THE SYSTEM SHALL 동작을 수행해야 한다

3단계: 엣지 케이스 식별

잠재적 위험 요소와 예외 상황을 파악합니다:

  • 입력 유효성 검사 실패
  • 네트워크 오류
  • 동시성 충돌
  • 권한 부족

4단계: OKR 정렬

기능이 상위 목표에 어떻게 기여하는지 명시합니다:

항목 설명
Objective 이 기능이 기여하는 상위 목표
Key Result 이 기능으로 달성 가능한 측정 가능한 결과
Alignment 직접 기여(Direct) / 간접 기여(Indirect) / 지원(Enabler)

OKR이 프로젝트에 정의되어 있지 않으면 이 단계를 건너뜁니다.

5단계: 이해관계자 매핑

기능에 영향을 받는 이해관계자를 Power/Interest 그리드로 분류:

           High Power
    ┌──────────┬──────────┐
    │  Manage  │  Engage  │
    │ closely  │ actively │
Low ├──────────┼──────────┤ High
Int │ Monitor  │   Keep   │ Interest
    │  only    │ informed │
    └──────────┴──────────┘
           Low Power
  • Engage actively (High Power + High Interest): 의사결정자, 핵심 사용자 → 요구사항 심층 반영
  • Manage closely (High Power + Low Interest): 경영진, 리더 → 정기 업데이트
  • Keep informed (Low Power + High Interest): 파워 유저, 커뮤니티 → 변경 알림
  • Monitor (Low Power + Low Interest): 간접 영향 그룹 → 최소 커뮤니케이션

6단계: 구현 우선순위 결정

MoSCoW 방식으로 우선순위를 분류합니다:

  • Must Have: 반드시 필요한 핵심 기능
  • Should Have: 있으면 좋은 중요 기능
  • Could Have: 여유가 있으면 구현할 선택적 기능
  • Won't Have: 이번 릴리즈에서 제외할 기능

출력 형식

기획 완료 후 다음 형식으로 요약을 제공합니다:

## 기능 기획 요약

**기능명**: [이름]
**목적**: [한 줄 설명]

### Visual Brief

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A[현재 사용자/시스템 상태] --> B[핵심 변화]
  B --> C[완료 증거]
```

```text
[Wireframe or flow sketch]
- UI가 있으면 주요 화면/상태/행동을 배치합니다.
- UI가 없으면 sequence/data-flow/command-flow로 대체합니다.
```

### 요구사항
- [ ] [EARS 형식 요구사항 1]
- [ ] [EARS 형식 요구사항 2]

### 엣지 케이스
- [예외 상황 1]
- [예외 상황 2]

### 구현 우선순위
- **Must**: [핵심 기능]
- **Should**: [중요 기능]

Read the full file on GitHub · 122 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 122 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 125e8d2f851c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

planning is a skill published in the GitHub repository Insajin/autopus-adk (111 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,046 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.