Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Insajin/autopus-adk --skill refactoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Insajin/autopus-adkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/refactoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/refactoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/insajin/autopus-adk/refactoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00733 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Refactoring Skill
기존 동작을 보존하면서 코드 구조를 개선하는 스킬입니다.
핵심 원칙
- 테스트 먼저: 리팩토링 전 기존 동작을 테스트로 보호
- 작은 단계: 한 번에 하나의 변환만 적용
- 행동 보존: 외부 동작 변경 금지
- 기능 변경 분리: 리팩토링 커밋과 기능 변경 커밋 분리
안전한 리팩토링 패턴
Extract Function
// Before: 긴 함수
func processOrder(order *Order) error {
// 검증 로직 20줄
// 계산 로직 15줄
// 저장 로직 10줄
}
// After: 책임 분리
func processOrder(order *Order) error {
if err := validateOrder(order); err != nil {
return err
}
total := calculateTotal(order)
return saveOrder(order, total)
}
Extract Interface
// Before: 구체 타입에 의존
func SendEmail(client *SMTPClient, msg string) { ... }
// After: 인터페이스로 추상화
type EmailSender interface {
Send(msg string) error
}
func SendEmail(sender EmailSender, msg string) { ... }
Replace Conditional with Polymorphism
// Before: switch/if 분기
func price(t string) int {
switch t {
case "basic": return 100
case "pro": return 200
}
}
// After: 인터페이스 다형성
type Plan interface {
Price() int
}
Rename (전체 프로젝트)
# 호출자 확인 후 변경
grep -r "oldName" --include="*.go"
# IDE/도구 활용 권장 (gopls rename)
레거시 현대화 전략
Strangler Fig Pattern
- 새 구현체를 기존 시스템 옆에 배치
- 트래픽을 점진적으로 새 구현체로 이전
- 완전 이전 후 구 구현체 제거
Branch by Abstraction
- 변경 대상에 인터페이스 추출
- 기존 구현체를 인터페이스 구현으로 래핑
- 새 구현체 작성
- 의존성 주입으로 교체
데드코드 제거
확인 절차:
# 사용되지 않는 함수 탐지
go vet ./...
# 호출자 검색
grep -r "functionName" --include="*.go" | grep -v "_test.go"
제거 원칙:
- 호출자 0개 확인 후 제거
- 주석 처리 대신 완전 삭제 (git 히스토리에 보존됨)
// removed주석 남기지 않기
리팩토링 안전 체크리스트
- 기존 테스트 모두 통과
- 특성 테스트 추가 (기존 동작 보호)
- 각 단계 후 테스트 실행
- 리팩토링과 기능 변경 커밋 분리
- 변경 전후 동작 동일 확인
- fan_in >= 3 함수에 @AX:ANCHOR 태그
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 110 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A cf095b0a9227
refactoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository Insajin/autopus-adk (111 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 733 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination.
refactoring
Safely refactor code while maintaining behavior. Use when improving code structure, reducing duplication, extracting functions, or modernizing legacy code.
code-review
Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
autofix
Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.
code-review
AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security). Also drives the development inner loop: review uncommitted work, fix, re-review before commit.