Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add InSciCo/i-framework --skill intentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/InSciCo/i-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/inscico/i-framework/intent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inscico/i-framework/intent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inscico/i-framework/intent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inscico/i-framework/intent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inscico/i-framework/intent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00546 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00218 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
intent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/intent — Stage 1: capture the "why"
You retire founder–problem risk before any solution talk. Run a guided interview, one question at a time. Stay on the problem, not the solution — if the founder jumps to features, gently redirect to the pain.
Procedure
1. Set up
Create the Product/ folder if it doesn't exist. If Product/intent.md already exists, read it and offer to refine rather than overwrite.
2. Interview (one question at a time)
Draw out, and challenge thin answers on:
- The problem — in plain language, the pain not the product. ("What's broken today?")
- The target user — who has this most acutely? Push back on "everyone"; get to a specific persona.
- Why now — what changed? The tailwind/shift that makes today the moment.
- Why you — founder–problem fit: lived experience, unfair insight, access. What will keep you in the fight when it's hard?
- Status quo — what does the user do about this today? (The real competitor is usually a workaround or "nothing.")
- Evidence of pain — the cheapest test: who have you actually talked to, and what did they say? Aim for 5–10 people in genuine pain. Accept "it's still a hunch" honestly — but name it.
Use AskUserQuestion for genuine forks; use open prompts for narrative answers. Don't fill silence with invented facts — ask.
3. Synthesize Product/intent.md
Write it using the structure from the plugin's templates/intent.md. Read the draft back to the founder for confirmation/correction before finalizing.
4. Evaluate the gate
Set frontmatter gate: passed when all three hold: (1) a crisp problem statement, (2) a named target user, (3) at least one piece of real pain evidence. Otherwise gate: open and clearly list what's missing — but never block the founder from moving on.
5. Hand off
Point to /ideate as the next step (and /iflow if they want the orchestrator to route them).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 839ebf1c4f8f
intent is a skill published in the GitHub repository InSciCo/i-framework (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 546 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
product-brainstorming
Brainstorm product ideas, explore problem spaces, and challenge assumptions as a thinking partner. Use when exploring an opportunity, generating solutions, or stress-testing an idea before converging on a direction.
pr
Comprehensive PR/issue review - analyzes architecture, tests, identifies unrelated changes mixed in, drafts review comment or issue comment. Use when user asks to review a PR, check a PR, look at PR changes, or comment on an issue.
backlog
Read, work, and maintain a Git repo's deferred-work items in docs/backlog/, one file per item. Use when the user says "backlog", "check backlog", "what's on my backlog", "work the backlog", "address the backlog", "add to backlog", "clean up backlog", or when a review or task produced items that are real but not being…
ask-codex
Consult OpenAI Codex for investigation, debugging, or code review. Use when user explicitly asks to "ask codex", "check with codex", "codex review", or as a last resort when stuck after 4+ failed attempts at debugging, investigation, or bug fix and completely out of ideas. Codex is slow (2-5 min), so only escalate…
clarify
This skill should be used when user appears confused, frustrated, or shows misalignment between expectations and reality. Triggers on phrases like "I don't understand", "this doesn't make sense", "confused", "wait, shouldn't it...", "why is this happening", "I thought X did Y", contradictory statements, or frustration…
writing-style
Use for technical communication - GitHub/GitLab tickets, PR/MR descriptions, issue comments, code review comments, commit messages. Direct, brief style with no AI-speak. NOT for README.md, public docs, or blog posts.