Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add inspectr-hq/mcplab --skill mcplab-assistantgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/inspectr-hq/mcplabWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/inspectr-hq/mcplab/mcplab-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inspectr-hq/mcplab/mcplab-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inspectr-hq/mcplab/mcplab-assistant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/inspectr-hq/mcplab/mcplab-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/inspectr-hq/mcplab/mcplab-assistant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.03837 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01535 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00767 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00384 |
Grade A, and why
mcplab-assistant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +1 lines e4df605c621e
- 6d ago Changed f8ceb85f63e1
- 26d ago Changed · +15 lines 191d9e5802c0
- 1mo ago Changed · +65 lines · -47 tokens per session e9caf8521fb7
- 1mo ago First seen · 271 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 2a9129fda5e2
mcplab-assistant is a skill published in the GitHub repository inspectr-hq/mcplab (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 3,837 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
trulens-running-evaluations
Execute TruLens evaluations and view results.
agent-eval
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG…
testing-llm
LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.
browser-qa
Testing web apps through a real browser: reconnaissance before acting, selector discovery, state capture, console errors and screenshot evidence. Use on a web surface end to end, or to reproduce a front-end bug.
test-driven-development
Writing code with tests first: RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, reproduce bugs as failing tests before fixing, and avoid testing anti-patterns. Use when implementing behaviour, fixing a defect, or asked to add tests.
verification-before-completion
Proving work works before claiming it does: exercise the real path, read the actual output, gather fresh evidence per claim, and say what remains unverified. Use before reporting done, handing off, or posting results.