Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add int2t05/engineering-skills --skill oss-strategygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/int2t05/engineering-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/int2t05/engineering-skills/oss-strategy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/int2t05/engineering-skills/oss-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/int2t05/engineering-skills/oss-strategy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/int2t05/engineering-skills/oss-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/int2t05/engineering-skills/oss-strategy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00366 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
oss-strategy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Open Source Strategy
When to use
- Evaluate an open-source business and community strategy.
Not for: oss-polish for repository presentation.
Steps
-
Identify users, buyer, maintenance capacity and commercialization constraints.
-
Compare suitable business models against current primary evidence; avoid universal revenue ratios or launch-time claims.
-
Distinguish open-source licenses from source-available restrictions; verify obligations and leave adoption to the user.
-
Propose a bounded distribution experiment with success and stop criteria, costs and uncertainties.
Output: Suggested paths, subject to human audit: docs/research/strategy.md when durable strategy is requested.
Verify
- Recommendation matches real resources; license and commercial claims are sourced and adoption is explicit.
References
- engineering-principles.md — shared decision boundaries, scope and verification.
- product-principles.md — product discipline (opportunity = demand × giant blind spot ÷ difficulty, the real competitor is the current workaround).
- human-audit.md — document consent, readability and human review.
- references/commercialization-models.md — general pricing (subscription/freemium/usage/per-seat), value-based pricing, AI-product pricing trap, GTM motions (PLG/sales-led/product-led sales), indie-developer revenue ladder.
- GitHub README/Topics/About beautification:
08-ship/oss-polish.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -46 lines · -40 tokens per session f62ae0038159
- 21d ago Changed · +3 lines 8b06fb9789d5
- 2mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 490990017ed7
oss-strategy is a skill published in the GitHub repository int2t05/engineering-skills (3 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 366 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
deep-plan
Creates detailed, sectionized, TDD-oriented implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.
meta-prompting
Enhanced reasoning patterns via slash commands (/think, /verify, /adversarial, /edge, /compare, /confidence, /budget, /constrain, /json, /flip, /assumptions, /tensions, /analyze, /trade) or natural language ("argue against", "what could break", "show reasoning", "deep review", "meta-prompts", "thinking modes"…
review-prompt
Review LLM prompts against the prompt-engineering skill's principles — leading with where each line came from — and report the findings without modifying files. Use when reviewing prompt quality, auditing a prompt, evaluating a system prompt, or checking whether prompt issues are high-confidence and fixable.
llm
AI features you ship to users: structured output, tool schemas, prompt injection, evals. Use when "the model returns bad JSON", "it hallucinates", "stop it calling the wrong tool", "add evals", or an LLM feature can trigger refunds, emails or writes. Covers schema-constrained output, idempotent tool calls…
goal-test
A local experiment for testing a goal command that keeps an AI coding session working until a stated condition is judged complete. It uses a separate language model to evaluate the conversation after each assistant turn.
adhd
Divergent ideation across model families — the same brainstorm, but each cognitive frame is handed to a different model (Claude sub-agent, OpenAI Codex, a cheap third via OpenCode) so the ideas diverge by frame and by model priors at once. Use for open design questions, architecture and API shape, naming, schema…