openspec-propose

A workflow for proposing a software change and generating its planning documents in one step. It produces a proposal explaining what and why, a design describing how, and tasks listing the implementation work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you have a feature or fix to describe and want a named change with proposal, design, and task files ready for implementation.
Why use it?
It saves time when a request needs to become a complete, reviewable plan before coding starts. The resulting documents make the change easier to discuss and implement.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template/openspec-propose
Any agent
npx skills add intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template --skill openspec-propose
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,044 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00047 $0.01044
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00522
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00209
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00104

Measured yesterday against content hash 7cb1ff97265c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openspec-propose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to openspec-propose — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.opencode/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md · 111 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.

I'll create a change with artifacts:

  • proposal.md (what & why)
  • design.md (how)
  • tasks.md (implementation steps)

When ready to implement, run /opsx-apply


Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

  1. If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build

    Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:

    "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

    From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

  2. Create the change directory

    openspec new change "<name>"
    

    This creates a scaffolded change at openspec/changes/<name>/ with .openspec.yaml.

  3. Get the artifact build order

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to get:

    • applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])
    • artifacts: list of all artifacts with their status and dependencies
  4. Create artifacts in sequence until apply-ready

    Use the TodoWrite tool to track progress through the artifacts.

    Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):

    a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):

    • Get instructions:
      openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
      
    • The instructions JSON includes:
      • context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
      • template: The structure to use for your output file
      • instruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
      • outputPath: Where to write the artifact
      • dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
    • Read any completed dependency files for context
    • Create the artifact file using template as the structure
    • Apply context and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
    • Show brief progress: "Created "

    b. Continue until all applyRequires artifacts are complete

    • After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    • Check if every artifact ID in applyRequires has status: "done" in the artifacts array
    • Stop when all applyRequires artifacts are done

    c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):

    • Use AskUserQuestion tool to clarify
    • Then continue with creation
  5. Show final status

    openspec status --change "<name>"
    

Output

After completing all artifacts, summarize:

  • Change name and location
  • List of artifacts created with brief descriptions
  • What's ready: "All artifacts created! Ready for implementation."
  • Prompt: "Run /opsx-apply or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

  • Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type
  • The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
  • Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
  • Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
  • IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
    • Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
    • These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Guardrails

  • Create ALL artifacts needed for implementation (as defined by schema's apply.requires)
  • Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
  • If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
  • If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
  • Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

Read the full file on GitHub · 111 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 111 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 7cb1ff97265c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

openspec-propose is a skill published in the GitHub repository intent-driven-dev/intent-driven-template (121 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,044 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to openspec-propose, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.