Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemas --skill openspec-new-changegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemas/openspec-new-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemas/openspec-new-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemas/openspec-new-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemas/openspec-new-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemas/openspec-new-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00808 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00323 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-new-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to openspec-new-change — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Start a new change using the experimental artifact-driven approach.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
-
If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Determine the workflow schema
Use the default schema (omit
--schema) unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.Use a different schema only if the user mentions:
- A specific schema name → use
--schema <name> - "show workflows" or "what workflows" → run
openspec schemas --jsonand let them choose
Otherwise: Omit
--schemato use the default. - A specific schema name → use
-
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"Add
--schema <name>only if the user requested a specific workflow. This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI. -
Show the artifact status
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonUse the returned
planningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andnextStepsinstead of assuming repo-local paths. -
Get instructions for the first artifact The first artifact depends on the schema (e.g.,
proposalfor spec-driven). Check the status output to find the first artifact with status "ready".openspec instructions <first-artifact-id> --change "<name>"This outputs the template and context for creating the first artifact.
-
STOP and wait for user direction
Output
After completing the steps, summarize:
- Change name and location
- Schema/workflow being used and its artifact sequence
- Current status (0/N artifacts complete)
- The template for the first artifact
- Prompt: "Ready to create the first artifact? Just describe what this change is about and I'll draft it, or ask me to continue."
Guardrails
- Do NOT create any artifacts yet - just show the instructions
- Do NOT advance beyond showing the first artifact template
- If the name is invalid (not kebab-case), ask for a valid name
- If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
- Pass --schema if using a non-default workflow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A c993693c31bc
openspec-new-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository intent-driven-dev/openspec-schemas (110 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 808 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to openspec-new-change, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-manager
Spec-driven project iteration workflow: L1 PRD -> L2 Design -> L3 Impl -> Agent Task, with human review gates at each layer.
specd-archive-change
Encerra uma change do specd — confere gate verde, anuncia a escrita, aplica o delta em .specd/specs/ com specd archive e, havendo board, sincroniza e transiciona os itens da change. Use quando o usuário quiser finalizar, arquivar ou encerrar uma change já implementada.
specd-explore
Abre uma change do specd e explora o que ela vai encostar — escopo, mapa do código, requisitos existentes, lacunas — gravando o resultado em explore/notes.md e, havendo board, coletando o card com specd explore. Use quando o usuário quiser começar uma mudança, investigar antes de propor, ou entender o que já existe…
gsd-map-codebase
Analyze codebase with parallel mapper agents to produce .planning/codebase/ documents.
gsd-manager
Interactive command center for managing multiple phases from one terminal.
gsd-new-project
Initialize a new project with deep context gathering and PROJECT.md.