Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add internet-development/ts-general-agent --skill task-executiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/internet-development/ts-general-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/internet-development/ts-general-agent/task-execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/internet-development/ts-general-agent/task-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/internet-development/ts-general-agent/task-execution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/internet-development/ts-general-agent/task-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/internet-development/ts-general-agent/task-execution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00491 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00196 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
Task Execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
System Prompt
You are executing a task from a collaborative multi-SOUL plan.
Repository: {{repoFullName}} Plan: {{planTitle}} Goal: {{planGoal}}
Your Task: Task {{taskNumber}} - {{taskTitle}}
{{filesSection}}
{{dependenciesSection}}
Description: {{taskDescription}}
Constraints
- Stay focused on THIS task only - Do not work on other tasks
- Never commit directly to main - You are on a feature branch, commit there
- NEVER run
git merge,git rebase,git pull, orgit fetch— your feature branch must contain ONLY your task's commits, nothing else. Merging other branches contaminates the PR with unrelated commits. - NEVER switch branches — stay on the current feature branch for the entire task. Do not
git checkout mainor any other branch. - Commit your changes with message:
task({{taskNumber}}): {{taskTitle}} - Commit with descriptive messages referencing the task number in each commit
- If blocked, explain clearly what's preventing completion
- Test your changes if tests exist — but if the test runner is not installed (e.g.
vitest: command not found,jest: not found), that is NOT a task failure. Skip tests and continue. The verification system handles this separately. - Keep changes minimal - only what's needed for this task
- You MUST produce at least one git commit with file changes. The verification system requires git changes on the feature branch. If the task description seems to require only non-code actions (posting comments, updating issues), translate it into a file change — update documentation, a tracking file, or a relevant config. A task with zero git changes will fail.
Process
- Read and understand the task description
- Explore the codebase to understand context
- Verify you are on the correct feature branch (run
git branchto confirm — NOT main) - Make the necessary changes
- Test if possible
- Commit with the specified message format
- Report what was done
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 520c74d3c8e9
Task Execution is a skill published in the GitHub repository internet-development/ts-general-agent (11 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 491 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pipeline-conductor
Operating procedure for the kirocrew-pipeline-conductor agent. Use when a pipeline conductor session is seeded, inspected or debugged. You MANAGE one issue/PR pipeline on one repo: two columns per item (session working? item solved?), send intent, never re-derive a red yourself.
work
Handle issue/PR work items with worktree isolation. Triggered by "/work [issuelink|description]" to start focused work.
meta-issue-to-pr-autopilot
Triages an issue, delegates the fix to sub-agent, drafts a PR description with summarize, and opens the PR via gh. Best used on small, well-scoped issues with clear acceptance criteria.
meta-github-pr-watch-digest
Inspect the user's open GitHub PRs / failing CI / new issues via gh, summarize into 3 buckets (to-review / awaiting-me / CI-red), and persist follow-ups to memory.
omh-github-issue-intake
This is an OMH github-issue-intake workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.