Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add intimatep/PenTestClaw --skill mass-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/intimatep/PenTestClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/intimatep/pentestclaw/mass-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/intimatep/pentestclaw/mass-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/intimatep/pentestclaw/mass-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/intimatep/pentestclaw/mass-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/intimatep/pentestclaw/mass-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00895 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
mass_verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A aab7d1958d70
mass_verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository intimatep/PenTestClaw (11 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 895 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify
Test a behaviour claim as an investigator and report whether the evidence confirms or refutes it — CONFIRMED / REFUTED / INCONCLUSIVE with bash-captured evidence. Use when asked to verify a claim, prove a fix works, or check that a PR does what it says.
mk:verify
Unified verification: build→lint→test→type-check→coverage. Use for 'is everything green', 'run all checks', 'verify build'. Auto-called by mk:cook. NOT for lint/format only (see mk:lint-and-validate); NOT for test-to-requirement coverage mapping (see mk:nyquist).
verify
Stage 4 of the canonical coding workflow — execute verification checks, write verify.json, and gate completion on real evidence. Failure auto-routes to fix-loop.
kilocode-multimodal
Verify tool execution using text, audio, and VLM checks across PMOVES services on the KiloCode GLM lane. Use when validating multimodal outputs, capturing verification evidence, or binding verification to task/run IDs.
minimax-multimodal
Verify tool execution using text, audio, and VLM checks across PMOVES services. This skill should be used when validating multimodal outputs, capturing verification evidence, or binding verification to task/run IDs.
deploy-verify
Deploy Server OS and run the official end-to-end verification suite.