rugged-gemini: Skill for Gemini CLI

.gemini/skills/code-review/SKILL.md

code-review is a skill for Gemini CLI from irahardianto/rugged-gemini. It costs 36 tokens per session (2,012 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A systematic checklist for reviewing code. It checks for security, data, resource, testing, logging, error-handling, architecture, and consistency problems, then labels the findings by severity.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for feature reviews, pull-request reviews, and full project audits. It produces a findings document with severity tags and can apply project rules from GEMINI.md.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers find problems that automatic style checkers often miss, such as broken data writes, hidden errors, missing logs, or dependencies between the wrong parts of a project.

Skill for Gemini CLI

Written for Gemini CLI: installed under .gemini/. Also seen: mentions Gemini CLI.

This is irahardianto/rugged-gemini's own configuration. It tells Gemini CLI how to work on rugged-gemini itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything rugged-gemini configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to irahardianto/rugged-gemini. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/irahardianto/rugged-gemini/main/.gemini/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/irahardianto/rugged-gemini

Made for: Gemini CLI.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/rugged-gemini/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/rugged-gemini/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/rugged-gemini/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/rugged-gemini/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irahardianto/rugged-gemini/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irahardianto/rugged-gemini/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,012 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.02012
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00805
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00402
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00201

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 507b7bc1015f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.gemini/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 218 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

Systematically review against full rule set. Catches what linters miss: arch violations, missing observability, logic errors, pattern inconsistencies.

When to Invoke

  • Audit workflows (Phase 1: Code Review)
  • User-requested review
  • Best: fresh conversation (avoid confirmation bias)

Review Process

1. Scope

  • Feature review — all files in feature dir
  • PR review — changed files only
  • Full audit — all features

2. Load Rules

Apply rules from GEMINI.md. Use Rule Priority (§ Rule Priority) for severity.

3. Categories (Priority Order)

Critical (Must Fix):

  • [SEC] Security — injection, hardcoded secrets, broken auth
  • [DATA] Data integrity — missing error handling on writes, no transactions
  • [RES] Resource leaks — unclosed connections, missing cleanup

Major (Should Fix):

  • [TEST] Testability — I/O not behind interfaces, untested error paths
  • [OBS] Observability — missing logging, no correlation IDs
  • [ERR] Error handling — empty catch, swallowed errors
  • [ARCH] Architecture — circular deps, wrong layer access

Minor (Nice to Fix):

  • [PAT] Pattern consistency — deviation from codebase patterns
  • Naming — unclear names
  • Organization — fns too long, mixed responsibilities

Nit: style (linter catches), missing comments on complex logic.

4. Findings Output

# Code Review: {Feature/Module Name}
Date: {date}
Reviewer: AI Agent (fresh context)

## Summary
- **Files reviewed:** N
- **Issues found:** N (X critical, Y major, Z minor, W nit)

## Critical Issues
- [ ] **[SEC]** {description} — [{file}:{line}](file:///path)
- [ ] **[DATA]** {description} — [{file}:{line}](file:///path)

## Major Issues
- [ ] **[TEST]** {description} — [{file}:{line}](file:///path)
- [ ] **[OBS]** {description} — [{file}:{line}](file:///path)

## Minor Issues
- [ ] **[PAT]** {description} — [{file}:{line}](file:///path)

## Nit
- [ ] {description} — [{file}:{line}](file:///path)

## Rules Applied
List of rules referenced.

Read the full file on GitHub · 218 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 218 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 507b7bc1015f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository irahardianto/rugged-gemini (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 2,012 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens