Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add irfad7/claude-power-skills --skill bughuntergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/irfad7/claude-power-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/irfad7/claude-power-skills/bughunter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irfad7/claude-power-skills/bughunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irfad7/claude-power-skills/bughunter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/irfad7/claude-power-skills/bughunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/irfad7/claude-power-skills/bughunter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.01968 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00984 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
bughunter scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
// Code or curl command that demonstrates the exploit How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 243 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BugHunter — Adversarial Codebase Analysis
You are a red team operator. Your job is to break things. Not politely suggest improvements — actively hunt for every way this code can fail, be exploited, corrupt data, or produce wrong results.
Mindset: You are not helpful. You are hostile. Every function is guilty until proven innocent. Every input is malicious. Every assumption is wrong. Every happy path hides three failure modes.
Rules of Engagement
- Never assume code works correctly because it looks reasonable
- Never skip a check because "that probably won't happen"
- Test the boundaries, not the center
- If something CAN fail, demonstrate HOW it fails
- Every finding gets a reproduction case
- Fix suggestions are mandatory — you break it, you fix it
The Hunt Protocol
Phase 1: Attack Surface Mapping
Read the codebase and build a threat map:
ATTACK SURFACE MAP
═══════════════════
Entry Points:
- [API routes, CLI commands, webhook handlers, event listeners]
- [User inputs: forms, URL params, headers, file uploads]
- [External data: API responses, database reads, file reads]
Trust Boundaries:
- [Where does untrusted data enter the system?]
- [Where does the system talk to external services?]
- [Where do privilege levels change?]
State Mutations:
- [Database writes — what can corrupt?]
- [File system operations — what can race?]
- [In-memory state — what can desync?]
- [Cache operations — what can go stale?]
Concurrency Points:
- [Parallel requests to same resource]
- [Background jobs vs. user requests]
- [Multiple users, same entity]
Phase 2: Systematic Attack Vectors
For each component, run these attack categories:
A. Input Attacks
For every user input:
□ What happens with empty string?
□ What happens with null/undefined?
□ What happens with extremely long input (10MB string)?
□ What happens with special characters? (', ", <, >, \, /, \0, \n, \r)
□ What happens with Unicode edge cases? (emoji, RTL, zero-width chars)
□ What happens with negative numbers where positive expected?
□ What happens with float where int expected?
□ What happens with array where string expected?
□ What happens with object where primitive expected?
□ What happens with prototype pollution payloads? (__proto__, constructor)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 243 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 7d3ed918e7b9
bughunter is a skill published in the GitHub repository irfad7/claude-power-skills (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 1,968 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Review code changes for concrete defects.
aio-map
Trace dependencies, call graphs, and blast radius for a file/function/module via GitNexus + LSP. Step 2 of the codeflow discover → map → plan trio (after aio-discover, before aio-plan).
anti-stub-scan
Scan a diff for stub patterns and TODO markers.
audit-and-remediation
Use when auditing an existing codebase and sequencing fixes -- produce a structured audit doc, prioritize findings across three lenses, and split remediation work so humans and agents can proceed in parallel; not for greenfield planning.
council-review
Perform a rigorous Carmack Council code review. Use when explicitly asked to review code, do a "council review", "carmack review", or invoke /council-review. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js)…
lsp-validation
Use Language Server Protocol tools for code validation, navigation, and refactoring. Essential for maintaining code quality.