Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill --skill forge-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/forge-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/forge-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/forge-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/forge-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/forge-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00335 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
forge-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
73% identical to forge-accessibility — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Fullstack Forge adapter: forge-code
This file is a pointer maintained by Fullstack Forge. It exists so this agent host can discover and trigger the skill. The full playbook is not duplicated here: one canonical copy is shared by every installed host.
Read the canonical playbook now and follow it exactly:
../../../.fullstack-forge/skills/forge-code/SKILL.md
That path is relative to this file. From the installation root it is
.fullstack-forge/skills/forge-code/SKILL.md. Every resource the playbook references
(fullstack-forge/references/..., fullstack-forge/schemas/...,
fullstack-forge/templates/..., fullstack-forge/profiles/...) resolves relative to
.fullstack-forge/skills/.
The canonical playbook owns any deterministic composition step; perform that step exactly
once. This adapter never adds a second workflow or composition command.
Do not edit this adapter; edit the canonical playbook instead. If the canonical file is
missing or unreadable the installation is damaged. Report it and repair through the same
project-package, archive, or plugin mechanism that installed this adapter. Never fall back to
an unpinned npx forge, which may resolve an unrelated public package.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 72661c5b88a2
forge-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 335 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 73% identical to forge-accessibility, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high…
luna
Reviews code for objective correctness, security, and reliability.
architect-review
Master software architect specializing in modern architecture.
mantis-plan
Formulates a targeted defensive security reviewing plan based on the active threat model and historical learnings. Use when starting a security review campaign to map the codebase boundaries and generate a roadmap (workspace/plan.json). Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
code-review-ai-ai-review
Combine static analysis with model-assisted code review to assess security, performance, correctness, and architecture. Use when designing review automation or reviewing complex changes.
comprehensive-review-full-review
Coordinate code quality, architecture, security, performance, testing, and documentation reviews. Use when a change or codebase needs a consolidated assessment across these areas.