Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/wcag-audit-patternsnpx skills add is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill --skill wcag-audit-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/wcag-audit-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/wcag-audit-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/wcag-audit-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00535 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00267 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
wcag-audit-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to wcag-audit-patterns — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WCAG Audit Patterns
Comprehensive guide to auditing web content against WCAG 2.2 guidelines with actionable remediation strategies.
When to Use This Skill
- Conducting accessibility audits
- Fixing WCAG violations
- Implementing accessible components
- Preparing for accessibility lawsuits
- Meeting ADA/Section 508 requirements
- Achieving VPAT compliance
Core Concepts
1. WCAG Conformance Levels
| Level | Description | Required For |
|---|---|---|
| A | Minimum accessibility | Legal baseline |
| AA | Standard conformance | Most regulations |
| AAA | Enhanced accessibility | Specialized needs |
2. POUR Principles
Perceivable: Can users perceive the content?
Operable: Can users operate the interface?
Understandable: Can users understand the content?
Robust: Does it work with assistive tech?
3. Common Violations by Impact
Critical (Blockers):
├── Missing alt text for functional images
├── No keyboard access to interactive elements
├── Missing form labels
└── Auto-playing media without controls
Serious:
├── Insufficient color contrast
├── Missing skip links
├── Inaccessible custom widgets
└── Missing page titles
Moderate:
├── Missing language attribute
├── Unclear link text
├── Missing landmarks
└── Improper heading hierarchy
Detailed patterns and worked examples
Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
Best Practices
Do's
- Start early - Accessibility from design phase
- Test with real users - Disabled users provide best feedback
- Automate what you can - 30-50% issues detectable
- Use semantic HTML - Reduces ARIA needs
- Document patterns - Build accessible component library
Don'ts
- Don't rely only on automated testing - Manual testing required
- Don't use ARIA as first solution - Native HTML first
- Don't hide focus outlines - Keyboard users need them
- Don't disable zoom - Users need to resize
- Don't use color alone - Multiple indicators needed
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 81 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A db263a3405de
wcag-audit-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 535 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to wcag-audit-patterns, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-orchestration-improve-agent
Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
quinn
Proves the system works by writing and executing comprehensive test suites.
agent-qa-result-triage
Triage failed Agent QA runs with MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, fixed failure categories, confidence, and actionable next steps.
android_ui_verification
Automated end-to-end UI testing and verification on an Android Emulator using ADB.
policy-creation
Guide for adding new enterprise policies to Chromium. Complete guide for policy definitions, pref mapping, and writing tests.
mantis-plan
Formulates a targeted defensive security reviewing plan based on the active threat model and historical learnings. Use when starting a security review campaign to map the codebase boundaries and generate a roadmap (workspace/plan.json). Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.