Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add IsaacEryn/a11ychk --skill kwcag-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IsaacEryn/a11ychkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/isaaceryn/a11ychk/kwcag-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isaaceryn/a11ychk/kwcag-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isaaceryn/a11ychk/kwcag-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isaaceryn/a11ychk/kwcag-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isaaceryn/a11ychk/kwcag-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.00763 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
kwcag-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 46 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 7d4a71a95e30
kwcag-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository IsaacEryn/a11ychk (3 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 763 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
accessibility
Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is design), NOT test-runner setup (that is testing-web), NOT LCP/page-speed (that is…
iOS SwiftUI Accessibility
Enforces WCAG 2.2 accessible coding patterns when writing SwiftUI — labels, traits, Dynamic Type, contrast, touch targets, focus management, orientation, and more. Based on the ios-swiftui-accessibility-techniques project with 41 static analysis rules across 23 WCAG criteria.
Accessibility Auditor
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing combining automated axe-core scans with manual keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and focus management verification.
Axe-core Accessibility Testing
Accessibility testing skill using axe-core and Playwright for automated WCAG 2.1 compliance auditing, custom rules, and accessibility reporting.
accessibility-expert
Build interfaces usable by everyone: WCAG 2.2 conformance, semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, screen readers and accessible forms. Use when the user mentions accessibility, a11y, WCAG, ARIA, screen readers, keyboard navigation, colour contrast, focus management, the European Accessibility Act or Section 508, or…
a11y-testing
Automated accessibility testing with axe-core, Playwright, and jest-axe for WCAG compliance. Use when adding or validating a11y tests, running WCAG checks, or auditing UI accessibility.