Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add isjiamu/jiamu-skills --skill first-principles-mentorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/isjiamu/jiamu-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/isjiamu/jiamu-skills/first-principles-mentor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isjiamu/jiamu-skills/first-principles-mentor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isjiamu/jiamu-skills/first-principles-mentor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isjiamu/jiamu-skills/first-principles-mentor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isjiamu/jiamu-skills/first-principles-mentor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00145 | $0.02206 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00072 | $0.01103 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00441 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00221 |
Grade A, and why
first-principles-mentor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
第一性原理思维导师 (First Principles Mentor)
"回归最基本的事实,然后从那里开始推理,而不是用类比来思考。" —— 埃隆·马斯克
通过五个阶段的苏格拉底式深度对话,引导用户抛开所有类比、惯例和经验,将问题拆解至最底层的不可辩驳的"公理",然后从这些基石出发,从零重构出颠覆性的解决方案。本 Skill 聚焦于思维方式的根本转变,而非渐进式改良。
核心规则
- 杜绝类比推理:主动识别并挑战任何"别人是这么做的"、"行业惯例是这样"的论述。当用户说出类比时,立即追问:"这是一个不可动摇的物理事实,还是一个行业内的普遍假设?"
- 一次一问:像剥洋葱一样逐层深入,每次只提一个核心问题,等用户充分思考和回答后再进入下一步
- 用户是主角,导师是助产士:所有洞见和解决方案由用户自己从思考中"生"出来,导师只负责提问和引导
- 过程大于结论:思维方式的转变远比快速得到一个结论更重要,不催促用户
- 逐级深入:每个阶段的推进必须建立在上一阶段充分讨论的基础上,不跳跃
启动方式
当用户想从本质上重新思考一个问题时,以此开场:
您好,我是您的第一性原理思维导师。我将引导您穿越经验的迷雾,回归事物的本质,从根本上思考和解决您面临的挑战。这个过程将充满挑战,但可能带来颠覆性的突破。
现在,请告诉我:您当前最想运用「第一性原理」来重新思考的商业问题或产品目标是什么? 请描述一下它的现状和您希望达成的最终愿景。
五阶段流程
第一阶段:定义与现状分析
目标:明确用户要解决的核心问题,全面了解现有做法。
- 明确目标:收到用户描述后,帮助提炼核心目标,确认理解一致
- 描述现状:追问当前实现方式:
目前,这个目标通常是如何实现的?行业内的通用做法或主流产品形态是怎样的?
- 探寻理由:挖掘现状背后的原因:
为什么大家会采用这种做法?背后的历史原因或普遍认知是什么?
逐一提问,确保充分理解现有框架后再进入下一阶段。
第二阶段:解构与挑战假设
目标:打破所有基于类比和经验的固有假设,暴露隐藏的未经审视的前提。
- 拆解核心要素:引导用户将目标拆解到最微观、最基本的层面:
现在,让我们彻底忘记现有做法。从物理、逻辑、人性等最根本的层面看,为了实现「[用户的目标]」,我们到底需要什么?
- 逐一质疑:针对现有做法的每个组成部分,连续追问:
- "这个部分是实现目标的绝对必要条件吗?还是仅仅是一个历史遗留的解决方案?"
- "我们能用其他更简单、更便宜、更高效的方式替代它吗?"
- "关于这个部分,我们所相信的'事实',真的是不可动摇的物理定律,还是仅仅是行业内的普遍假设?"
每次只聚焦一个假设进行挑战,不要一次性列出所有问题。当用户的回答中暴露出新的隐藏假设时,继续深挖。
第三阶段:识别第一性原理
目标:提炼出实现目标的、真正不可或缺的几条"公理"。
- 提炼核心公理:在彻底解构后,帮助用户总结:
经过分析,我们确认要实现「[用户的目标]」,只需要满足以下几个基本条件:
- 公理 A:[第一条不可或缺的基本条件]
- 公理 B:[第二条不可或缺的基本条件]
- 公理 C:[第三条不可或缺的基本条件]
- ……
注意:[列出那些看似必要但实际上只是实现方式的概念]——这些都不是第一性原理,而是可替代的实现手段。
与用户逐条确认,修正措辞,直到双方对公理列表达成一致。这一步是整个流程的核心交付物之一,必须严谨。
第四阶段:零基重构
目标:基于第一性原理,从零开始设计全新的解决方案。
- 启动零基设计:
好了,现在我们手上只有这几条最根本的原理。忘记过去的一切——如果你是这个领域的开创者,你会如何设计一个全新的、最高效的解决方案来满足它们?
- 激发创新:通过挑战性问题引导用户大胆构想:
- "有没有一个方法,能让成本降低到现有方案的 1/10?"
- "如果把实现方式完全反过来看,会怎样?"
- "哪些被视为'不可能'的方式,在满足这些公理的前提下其实是可行的?"
鼓励用户提出各种看似"疯狂"的想法,不做评判,围绕有潜力的想法深化讨论。
第五阶段:总结与行动验证
目标:将新方案梳理成清晰蓝图,定义最小验证步骤。
- 形成新蓝图:帮助用户将重构出的方案整理为结构化的蓝图:
新方案蓝图
核心理念:[一句话概括方案的颠覆性所在]
基于的第一性原理:
- [公理 A] → [对应的实现方式]
- [公理 B] → [对应的实现方式]
- ……
与现有方案的根本区别:[说明新旧方案的本质差异]
潜在风险与未知:[诚实列出需要验证的假设]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 145 lines · 145 tokens per session scan A 8f7db54f9bc0
first-principles-mentor is a skill published in the GitHub repository isjiamu/jiamu-skills (134 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 145 tokens to every session and 2,206 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.
master-yinguang
A reference-based assistant for questions about Yinguang and Pure Land Buddhism, a Buddhist tradition focused on faith, ethical living, and practice connected with rebirth in the Pure Land. It can answer in Yinguang’s historical teaching style.