Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add isvlasov/rageatc-oss --skill finalise-sessiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/isvlasov/rageatc-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/finalise-session)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/finalise-session"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/finalise-session/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/finalise-session"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isvlasov/rageatc-oss/finalise-session.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00193 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00097 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
finalise-session scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Finalise Session
Run /handover (write mode) to update project files, then commit and push.
Step 1: Handover
Run /handover — review the session, update root files, sync CLAUDE.md pointers, check referenced files.
Step 2: Commit and push
Run git status first; if nothing changed, skip this step. Otherwise: stage the relevant files, commit with a message that reflects the session's work (no approval needed — the user asked by invoking this skill), and push. If push fails (e.g. no remote configured), report it but don't block.
Step 3: Report
- Files updated by handover (from its report)
- Committed and pushed: yes / no / no changes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 23 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A fcb7235488a6
finalise-session is a skill published in the GitHub repository isvlasov/rageatc-oss (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 193 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
post-commit
Use when a code commit just landed (not wip/amend/undo) and CHANGELOG or plugin-version post-commit actions are needed.
commit-detection
Detects optimal commit type from git changes. Use when analyzing commits, determining commit type, or before committing.
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
branch-and-worktree-workflow
Isolates feature work in its own branch or worktree and integrates it cleanly when done. Use this when starting work that should not disturb the current workspace, when several efforts must proceed in parallel on one repository, or when implementation is finished and the change needs merging, rebasing, or splitting…
genshijin-commit
A guide for writing short Git commit messages in Conventional Commits format, a shared style that labels changes such as features, fixes, tests, and documentation. It supports Japanese and English and emphasizes explaining why a change was made.