multica-backend-impl

multica-backend-impl is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from it235/multica-best-practices. It costs 32 tokens per session (280 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A backend implementation workflow for building server-side code and APIs from approved requirements and technical designs. It uses TDD, meaning tests are written or updated as part of the implementation cycle.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to read Jira and Confluence requirements, implement API and service changes, write unit tests, and verify the backend before deployment.
Why use it?
It prevents developers from guessing unclear API behaviour and blocks delivery when required information or tests are missing. It also requires existing and new unit tests to pass before merging.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to read Jira and Confluence requirements, implement API and service changes, write unit tests, and verify the backend before deployment.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-backend-impl
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add it235/multica-best-practices --skill multica-backend-impl
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/it235/multica-best-practices

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for multica-backend-impl

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-backend-impl/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-backend-impl)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-backend-impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-backend-impl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for multica-backend-impl

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-backend-impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-backend-impl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 280 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.00280
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00112
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00056
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00028

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 746acfcaa197, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

multica-backend-impl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

templates/en_US/skills/backend/multica-backend-impl/SKILL.md · 33 lines

What it actually says

Backend Implementation (backend-impl)

Responsibility

As @BackendDev, implement backend code (API / data model / business logic) per the architect's technical design, then push the contract to backend-artifact via multica-artifact-backend.

Conventions

  • Follow the module/package layout agreed in multica-artifact-architect.
  • API contracts (path/params/response) must match the design exactly.
  • Business logic must cover the AC-derived edge cases.

Acceptance checklist

  • API contract matches design (no silent field changes)
  • Data model migration is reversible
  • Error codes/responses are documented
  • Unit tests cover core logic

Flow

  1. Implement per design.
  2. Self-check against the checklist.
  3. Push contract to backend-artifact (multica-artifact-backend), then hand off to @Tester (API automation) and @Reviewer.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · -60 lines · -19 tokens per session 746acfcaa197
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 753a2dd6eb78

Subscribe to this mod's changes

multica-backend-impl is a skill published in the GitHub repository it235/multica-best-practices (212 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 280 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.