Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add itmisx/deepx-code --skill openspecgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/itmisx/deepx-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/itmisx/deepx-code/openspec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/itmisx/deepx-code/openspec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/itmisx/deepx-code/openspec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/itmisx/deepx-code/openspec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/itmisx/deepx-code/openspec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01344 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00538 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
openspec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OpenSpec — 规格驱动开发(SDD)
提炼自官方 OpenSpec(https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec)的约定、文件格式与流程。 核心:"Agree before you build" —— 改动的行为规格写清楚、与用户对齐后,再写实现代码。
理念(不是僵硬的瀑布)
- fluid not rigid:不设阶段闸门,可按合理顺序产出 artifacts。
- iterative not waterfall:边做边学,规格可迭代细化。
- easy not complex:轻量、少仪式。
- brownfield-first:多数是改既有系统,所以用 delta(增/改/删) 描述"对现有行为的改动",而非从零描述整个系统。
目录两区
openspec/
specs/ # 真相基线:系统【当前】如何工作(按 capability 分)
<capability>/spec.md
changes/ # 提案:对基线的【改动】,每个改动一个文件夹
<change-id>/
proposal.md # 为什么 + 改什么
design.md # 可选,仅复杂改动写(技术方案/取舍)
tasks.md # 实现清单
specs/<capability>/spec.md # 该改动对规格的 DELTA(ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED)
specs/ 是源头真相;changes/<id>/ 是尚未合并的改动。归档时 change 的 delta 合并进 specs/。
文件格式(照官方,别自由发挥)
proposal.md
## Why
<动机:为什么要这个改动>
## What Changes
### 1. <子改动>
<说明>
### 2. <子改动>
...
tasks.md
## 1. <分组>
- [ ] 1.1 <小而可验证的任务>
- [ ] 1.2 ...
## 2. <分组>
- [ ] 2.1 ...
specs//spec.md —— 关键:delta 格式
按 ADDED / MODIFIED / REMOVED / RENAMED 标 delta;每条 Requirement 用 SHALL,且至少含一个 Scenario:
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: <名称>
<The system SHALL ...>
#### Scenario: <场景名>
- **WHEN** <条件>
- **THEN** <预期>
- **AND** <附加预期>
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: <已存在的需求名>
<改后的 SHALL 描述 + 场景>
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: <要删除的需求名>
绝不用 README.md 或自由 bullet 代替——必须是 spec.md,且用上面的 Requirement + Scenario(WHEN/THEN)结构。
design.md(可选)
仅当改动复杂、需要记录架构 / 关键决策 / 取舍时才写;简单改动跳过。
工作流
- Propose:在
openspec/changes/<change-id>/建文件夹,写proposal.md+(需要时)design.md+tasks.md+specs/<capability>/spec.md(delta)。分成"短到能读完"的小块给用户看,迭代到对齐。 - Implement:对齐后按
tasks.md逐项实现,严格遵循 spec delta;每完成勾掉。若现实迫使偏离规格,先停下更新规格、重新对齐,别默默跑偏。 - Archive:改动完成并验证后,把它的 spec delta **应用(apply)**进
openspec/specs/基线,并把 change 文件夹移入归档(如openspec/changes/archive/)。- 应用语义:
ADDED→ 把该 Requirement 加入基线;MODIFIED→ 用新内容替换基线里同名 Requirement;REMOVED→ 从基线删除该 Requirement。 - 关键:
## ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED是只属于 change 里那份 delta 的标记。基线specs/<capability>/spec.md是当前真相,只保留当前的 Requirements / Scenario,不要带这些 delta 标记(用## Requirements或直接列### Requirement:即可)。换句话说:归档是"把 delta 应用进基线",不是"把 delta 整份拷进基线"。
- 应用语义:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 3857d09b51d5
openspec is a skill published in the GitHub repository itmisx/deepx-code (391 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,344 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
plugin-creator
Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required .codex-plugin/plugin.json, optional plugin folders/files, valid manifest defaults, and personal-marketplace entries by default. Use when Codex needs to create a new personal plugin, add optional plugin structure, generate or update marketplace entries…
update-v8-version
Update Codex's pinned v8 / rustyv8 versions, validate the release-candidate path, and investigate failed V8 canary or artifact builds. Use when asked to bump V8, update rustyv8 artifacts, prepare or validate a V8 release candidate, check v8-canary, or diagnose why a V8 version update no longer builds.
agent-state-bar
A design guide for an agent status bar: a short, automatically updated summary of progress, remaining tasks, tool counts, errors, and system state placed near the latest model input.
reward-design
A guide to defining the scores that an AI agent receives during trial-and-error training. It covers checks based on rules, human preferences, or another model, and distinguishes rewarding the final result from rewarding the steps taken.
agent-evolution
A guide to making an AI agent improve from its past runs. It covers how to judge results, extract reusable lessons, and decide whether to store them as knowledge, instructions, code, or model training.
knowledge-org
A guide to organising large bodies of knowledge so an AI system can navigate relationships, summaries, and layers instead of searching only flat text chunks. It covers tree indexes, knowledge graphs, file-like structures, incremental updates, and long-term memory layouts.