Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add itseffi/agentic-os --skill davcigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/itseffi/agentic-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/itseffi/agentic-os/davci)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/itseffi/agentic-os/davci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/itseffi/agentic-os/davci/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/itseffi/agentic-os/davci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/itseffi/agentic-os/davci.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00587 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00235 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
davci scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DAVCI Decision Rights
Define clear decision rights using the DAVCI framework.
When to Use
When you need to clarify who decides, approves, and must be consulted on a decision.
The Framework
| Role | Definition | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| D - Decider | Single person accountable for outcome | Exactly one per decision |
| A - Approver | Can override the Decider | Optional; cannot be the D |
| V - Veto | Can block for specific domain | One per domain; time-boxed |
| C - Consulted | Has input before decision | Keep to 5 or fewer |
| I - Informed | Needs to know after decision | Keep targeted |
The Process
1. Define the Decision Object
Be specific about what's being decided:
- Clear title
- Concrete deadline
- Decision type (Strategy, Scope, Design, Technical, Process, Risk, Commercial)
2. Assign Roles
Decider (D):
- Who is accountable for the outcome?
- Must be one person only
Approver (A):
- Does D need air cover for risk/budget/politics?
- If yes, name person one level up
Veto (V):
- Which domains apply? (Security, Legal, Privacy, Brand, Compliance)
- One person per domain
- Set veto window (default: 48 hours)
Consulted (C):
- Who has unique information to improve the decision?
- Cap at 5; merge by role if needed
Informed (I):
- Who must act after or needs awareness?
- Keep targeted to those who need it
3. Add Decision Metadata
- Deadline: Date and time
- Escalation: If blocked 24h, escalate to whom?
- Success test: One checkable sentence
- Comms plan: Channel, audience, timing
Output Format
Decision: [title]
Deadline: [date/time]
Type: [Strategy/Scope/Design/Technical/Process/Risk/Commercial]
D: [name, role]
A: [name, role] or None
V: [Domain - name, window hours]
C: [role/name]; [role/name]
I: [role/name]; [role/name]
Escalation: [name, role]
Success test: [single checkable sentence]
Comms: [channel + audience + timing]
When Not to Use
Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A abce20993056
davci is a skill published in the GitHub repository itseffi/agentic-os (117 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 587 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
vague-requirement-unpacker
A planning aid for turning a vague business request into questions, a narrowed scenario, and an initial scope outline. It is meant for early alignment before a full PRD, or product requirements document, exists.
reviewcourt
A review tool for completed Tencent Meeting requirements or technical-plan meetings. It turns the meeting notes and transcript into a verdict, such as approved, conditionally approved, rejected, or lacking enough information.
competitive-product-research
A research workflow for comparing products and explaining how they differ. It examines user experience and business strategy, then produces a report in HTML or Markdown with traceable sources.
opc-board
A review skill for testing whether a one-person business, side project, or open-source idea is practical. Five advisers score its logic, ability to be delivered, growth potential, viability, and risks, then give a Go or No-Go result.
pm-requirement-review-simulator
A rehearsal for reviewing a product requirements document, or PRD—a written description of what a product or feature should do. Five cross-functional roles challenge the requirements before the real meeting.
ide-briefing-ppt
Generates a single-file 1280x720 HTML presentation by reusing the frozen Light IDE visual system extracted from LLM Wiki 分享.html. Use only when the user names ide-briefing-ppt, asks to reuse that deck's UI, or explicitly requests the combined light-gray canvas, white panels, amber accent, terminal, and file-tree…