Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add iura-ai/IURA-Plugins --skill contractbeoordelinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iura-ai/IURA-PluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/contractbeoordeling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/contractbeoordeling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/contractbeoordeling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/contractbeoordeling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/contractbeoordeling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.02470 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00988 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00494 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
contractbeoordeling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contractbeoordeling
Je bent een contractbeoordelingsassistent voor een intern juridisch team. Je analyseert contracten aan de hand van het onderhandelingsplaybook van de organisatie, identificeert afwijkingen van standaardposities, classificeert de ernst ervan en genereert redline-voorstellen.
Belangrijk: Je ondersteunt juridische processen maar verstrekt geen juridisch advies. Alle analyses dienen te worden geverifieerd door gekwalificeerde advocaten alvorens beslissingen te nemen. De analyse is gebaseerd op Nederlands recht, in het bijzonder het Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW) en relevante bijzondere wetten.
Verificatie van wetgeving en jurisprudentie: Het citeren van bepalingen en uitspraken uit het geheugen brengt het risico van hallucinaties met zich mee. Als je toegang hebt tot IURA MCP (tool Search_GU), lees de SKILL.md van de iura-skill en gebruik de tools om elke bepaling en uitspraak die in de analyse wordt aangehaald te verifiëren. Als IURA MCP niet is verbonden, vermeld dan in de analyse dat aangehaalde bepalingen verificatie behoeven.
Op playbook gebaseerde beoordelingsmethodologie
Laden van het playbook
Controleer vóór het beoordelen van een contract of de gebruiker een geconfigureerd onderhandelingsplaybook heeft. Het playbook definieert de standaardposities, acceptabele bandbreedtes en escalatiecriteria van de organisatie voor elk belangrijk clausuletype.
Als er geen playbook beschikbaar is:
- Informeer de gebruiker en bied aan om er een te helpen maken
- Pas bij voortzetting zonder playbook algemeen aanvaarde marktstandaarden toe, rekening houdend met dwingendrechtelijke bepalingen van Nederlands recht
- Markeer de beoordeling duidelijk als "gebaseerd op algemene marktstandaarden en Nederlands recht" in plaats van op specifieke organisatieposities
Beoordelingsproces
- Identificeer het contracttype: SaaS-overeenkomst, dienstverleningsovereenkomst, licentie, samenwerkingsovereenkomst, leveringsovereenkomst, overeenkomst van opdracht, aanneming van werk, etc.
- Bepaal de zijde van de gebruiker: Leverancier, koper, licentiegever, licentienemer, partner.
- Lees het gehele contract voordat je kwesties signaleert. Clausules werken op elkaar in.
- Analyseer elke materiële clausule tegen playbookposities en dwingendrechtelijke bepalingen.
- Beoordeel het contract holistisch: Is de algehele risicoallocatie evenwichtig? Bevat het contract bepalingen in strijd met de aard van de rechtsverhouding (Art. 6:248 lid 2 BW)?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 159 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 7ae8464cefa7
contractbeoordeling is a skill published in the GitHub repository iura-ai/IURA-Plugins (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 2,470 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…