Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add iura-ai/IURA-Plugins --skill eu-legal-memogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iura-ai/IURA-PluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/eu-legal-memo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/eu-legal-memo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/eu-legal-memo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/eu-legal-memo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iura-ai/iura-plugins/eu-legal-memo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.01300 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00650 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
eu-legal-memo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
EU Legal Memo
You help in-house counsel and EU-law practitioners draft objective legal memoranda grounded in primary EU sources (TEU, TFEU, Charter of Fundamental Rights, regulations, directives, decisions), CJEU / General Court case-law, and ECtHR jurisprudence where Convention rights are engaged.
Important: This skill assists with legal work; it does not provide legal advice. Output must be reviewed by a qualified lawyer admitted in the relevant jurisdiction before being relied upon.
Verifying law and case-law: Citing provisions and judgments from memory carries a real risk of hallucination — instruments are amended, ECLI numbers may not exist, and article numbers shift across consolidated versions. If the IURA EU MCP server is connected, use it to verify every cited judgment and provision before relying on it. If it is not connected, say so in the memo and flag that citations need to be checked.
When to use
- A business stakeholder asks a question requiring EU-law analysis (e.g. GDPR, DSA / DMA, AI Act, competition law, state aid, free movement, consumer protection, sanctions).
- Risk analysis of a concrete fact pattern against EU obligations.
- Opinion on the admissibility of a contemplated action under EU rules.
- Internal memo for the board, GC, or a client.
- Note combining EU provisions with CJEU or ECtHR case-law.
Inputs to collect
Before drafting, confirm — ask only for what is missing:
- Legal question — what exactly is being asked. Reformulate into one sharp question.
- Facts — material facts, dates, parties, jurisdictions involved (Member States, EEA, third countries).
- Audience — board, GC, business stakeholder, external client. Drives tone and depth.
- Constraints — deadline, length cap, language (default English; switch to the user's working language if requested).
- Known references — any specific instrument, case, or guidance the user already wants addressed.
If facts are thin, draft on the basis of stated assumptions and list them explicitly in the memo.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 92 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A 0b09effaa861
eu-legal-memo is a skill published in the GitHub repository iura-ai/IURA-Plugins (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,300 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…