coding-standards

coding-standards is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from iurysza/android-use. It costs 34 tokens per session (1,589 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of general rules for writing and reviewing code safely and consistently across programming languages. It covers input handling, failures, dependencies, domain meaning, tests, and types.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when implementing or reviewing code, especially at system boundaries where outside data must be checked and converted into reliable application data.
Why use it?
It helps prevent unclear data, hidden failures, unsafe assumptions, and unnecessary changes while fitting the repository's existing conventions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it when implementing or reviewing code, especially at system boundaries where outside data must be checked and converted into reliable application data.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/iurysza/android-use/coding-standards
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add iurysza/android-use --skill coding-standards
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iurysza/android-use

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for coding-standards

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iurysza/android-use/coding-standards/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/iurysza/android-use/coding-standards)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iurysza/android-use/coding-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iurysza/android-use/coding-standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for coding-standards

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/iurysza/android-use/coding-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/iurysza/android-use/coding-standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,589 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.01589
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00794
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00318
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00159

Measured 6d ago against content hash 6253379efc4b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-21, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coding-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/coding-standards/SKILL.md · 177 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Coding Standards

Inspect the repository before introducing patterns, libraries, or abstractions. Follow compatible local conventions; contain incompatible legacy patterns at the nearest boundary instead of spreading them into new code.

The examples use TypeScript syntax, but the principles apply across languages. Adapt them to the language and ecosystem already in use.

Priorities

  1. Correctness, safety, and debuggability.
  2. Explicit domain meaning and dependencies.
  3. Compatibility with sound project conventions.
  4. The narrowest change that fully solves the requested behavior.
  5. Documentation for surprising, durable trade-offs.

Parse at boundaries

Turn unknown or loosely shaped input into application and domain types as early as possible.

unknown -> protocol input -> parser -> domain/application input

A parser returns the refined value or an explicit parsing failure. Do not validate input and then continue carrying the original primitive or transport shape.

Use constrained domain types where they prevent realistic mistakes: identifiers, URLs, email addresses, money, units, constrained numbers, and non-empty values. Construct them through parsers or smart constructors.

Expected failures are values

Known failures belong in explicit return types or equivalent language constructs. This includes parsing, authorization, configuration, persistence, I/O, integration, and workflow failures.

type Result<T, E extends Error> =
  | { readonly _tag: "ok"; readonly value: T }
  | { readonly _tag: "err"; readonly error: E };

Translate dependency-specific exceptions inside the adapter that owns that dependency. Reserve throws, panics, or equivalent mechanisms for defects and impossible internal states. At entrypoints, turn expected failures into valid protocol outcomes: responses, exit codes, retry decisions, dead letters, or startup messages.

Errors should have a stable category, useful safe context, and preserve the original cause where the language supports it. Never put secrets or raw credentials in errors, traces, snapshots, or logs.

Read the full file on GitHub · 177 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 177 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 6253379efc4b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coding-standards is a skill published in the GitHub repository iurysza/android-use (18 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,589 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

babysit

Use when a user asks to babysit, monitor, keep checking, keep an eye on, or report when a pull request, CI run, ticket, deployment, or other changing target reaches an outcome.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 45 tokens

rubber-duck

Adversarial "rubber duck" review that turns explaining-out-loud into a hallucination check. The main session is the PRESENTER (it did the work — a design doc, investigation, or analysis — and holds the real reasoning) and reconstructs the topic to a LISTENER — a spawned subagent pinned to a DIFFERENT-vendor model that…

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 161 tokens

learn-from-sage

Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 56 tokens

pr-review

Review a GitHub pull request using multiple expert personas. Takes a PR URL as input, analyzes the changes, and generates comprehensive review feedback from different perspectives (Merge Specialist, Frontend, Backend, Security, DevOps, AI/Agent, SRE, Chief Architect).

agentic-community/mcp-gateway-registry · 57 tokens

review-fix-signoff-loop

Use when writing Agent Relay or Ricky workflows that must loop review, fix, and validation with fresh agent context until independent signoff agents, typically Claude and Codex, both agree the work is comprehensively complete. Covers fresh-context iterations, repairable gates, dual reviewer verdict contracts…

AgentWorkforce/relay · 77 tokens

cocoreview

CocoReview — structured code review with six-severity findings vocabulary, progressive disclosure architecture, and universal anti-pattern baseline. Invoked via $review [file] [--complexity] [--security] [--architecture] [--language ].

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 57 tokens