Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ivanviragine/wade --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivanviragine/wadeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanviragine/wade/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanviragine/wade/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanviragine/wade/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanviragine/wade/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanviragine/wade/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00184 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00092 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +1 lines 4d8d38fcf2db
- 6d ago First seen · 19 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 9164c483de41
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ivanviragine/wade (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 184 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
agentplane-task-closure-recovery
Use when Agentplane task completion, direct finish, branchpr integration, hosted-close, close-tail PRs, PR metadata, dirty task artifacts, or remote branch divergence need diagnosis or recovery.
argot-setup
Set argot up for a repository end to end — audit its history, decide what should shape its voice, fit, verify the fit actually catches things, tune the rules its own history says are noisy, and wire the places it runs (pre-write hook, pre-commit, MCP, CI). One sitting, one decision at a time, each proposed with the…
detect-task
Internal skill for commands. Detect the active task (any tracker adapter) from the task-state file / git branch name. Do not trigger on user conversation - only when commands need task detection.
dos-verify-done-claims
Before accepting an agent's 'done / shipped / fixed' claim, verify it against ground truth (git ancestry + the commit's own diff) using the DOS kernel's dos verify and dos commit-audit — never the agent's own narration.
loop-bb-pr
A command that prepares a repeating check for a Bitbucket pull request. A pull request is a request to review and merge code changes into a project.
take-task
A workflow for claiming a tracker task and preparing the development branch for it. It verifies the task, marks it as in progress, checks for uncommitted changes, and handles branch setup according to the task state.