Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ivegamsft/basecoat --skill copilot-review-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivegamsft/basecoatWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivegamsft/basecoat/copilot-review-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivegamsft/basecoat/copilot-review-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivegamsft/basecoat/copilot-review-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivegamsft/basecoat/copilot-review-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivegamsft/basecoat/copilot-review-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.00551 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00275 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
copilot-review-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Copilot Review Triage
Process inbound Copilot review threads without silently discarding feedback. Read unresolved threads first. Never force-push or resolve before recording outcomes. Treat security, authorization, API, schema, and deployment-contract suggestions as Large unless a human scoped the change.
Impact Sizing
| Size | Signals | Default disposition |
|---|---|---|
| Small | Cosmetic, local, and behavior-preserving | Apply if trivially correct; otherwise reply with a reason and resolve. |
| Medium | Bounded edge case, refactor, validation, or test change | Rubber-duck validate; apply if sound and in scope, otherwise decline with a reason and resolve. |
| Large | Cross-cutting, security-sensitive, contractual, ambiguous, or scope-expanding | Never auto-apply; summarize risk, escalate, and leave open. |
Per-Thread Decision Loop
- Classify the suggestion and its acceptance impact.
- Apply or decline Small items with a recorded reason, then resolve.
- Rubber-duck validate Medium items; apply or decline with a reason, then resolve.
- Do not edit or resolve Large items; escalate its surface, risk, and decision.
- Batch accepted Small and Medium work into one focused commit.
Completion Gate
After applying a batch:
- Run relevant validation and a
code-reviewrisk pass. - Reply with a commit SHA or decline reason.
- Auto-merge only if no Large items remain and required checks pass.
Recorded Decision Format
Use a reply that makes the disposition auditable:
Impact: Medium
Decision: Declined and resolved
Reason: The suggested validation duplicates the existing boundary check and
would not change the observable behavior.
For applied work, give the commit SHA and validation evidence. For Large work,
state Decision: Escalated; left open.
Anti-Patterns
- Silently ignoring a declined suggestion.
- Auto-applying a Large item.
- Evading required review-thread resolution.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 64 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 91be47731e34
copilot-review-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository ivegamsft/basecoat (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 551 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
write-pr
Reference standards for writing pull request titles and descriptions in the tldraw repository, plus the pre-flight comment sweep over the diff. Use as supporting guidance when another skill or workflow needs PR content standards, not as the user-facing create/update PR workflow.