Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Ivy-Interactive/Ivy-Tendril. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Ivy-Interactive/Ivy-Tendril/development/.claude/skills/tendril-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ivy-Interactive/Ivy-TendrilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivy-interactive/ivy-tendril/tendril-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivy-interactive/ivy-tendril/tendril-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivy-interactive/ivy-tendril/tendril-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivy-interactive/ivy-tendril/tendril-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivy-interactive/ivy-tendril/tendril-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00772 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00386 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
tendril-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 99 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 4a60c50c4205
tendril-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ivy-Interactive/Ivy-Tendril (177 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 772 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
moai-ref-cross-model-audit
Cross-model audit convergence reference for the plan-auditor and sync-auditor agents. Documents how to invoke the auditmulti MCP tool to fan a code review out across the codex and GLM (z.ai) backends in parallel, converge their verdicts with the in-session Claude verdict, and fold the resulting per-backend verdicts +…
moai-foundation-quality
TRUST 5 quality principles and how MoAI enforces them through agents, the 3-level harness, /moai gate, and sync-auditor scoring. Use for code review, quality gate checks, coverage targets, or TRUST 5 compliance.
code-reviewer
Automatic code quality and best practices analysis. Use proactively when files are modified, saved, or committed. Analyzes code style, patterns, potential bugs, and security basics. Triggers on file changes, git diff, code edits, quality mentions.
code-review
Review implementation code against the plan for drift, gaps, and blind spots. Triggers: /code-review, review code, check implementation, compare to plan, code vs plan.
sdd-code-review
Review implementation code against a plan, specification, or design for drift, correctness, missing requirements, and blind spots.
fresh-eyes
Audit a finished diff with fresh eyes. The mechanism is double-blind reconciliation: a subagent that never saw the conversation reads the diff blind and reports what it thinks the change does. The main context — which holds the real intent — compares that blind read against what the work was meant to do. The…