Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide/phoenix-authorization-patternsnpx skills add j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide --skill phoenix-authorization-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guideWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide/phoenix-authorization-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide/phoenix-authorization-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide/phoenix-authorization-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.02343 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01171 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00469 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
phoenix-authorization-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phoenix Authorization Patterns
RULES — Follow these with no exceptions
- Always authorize on the server in event handlers — UI-only checks (hiding buttons) are not security; always verify in
handle_event/3 - Verify resource ownership by comparing
current_scope.user.idagainst the resource'suser_id— never trust client-sent user IDs - Use policy modules for complex authorization — don't inline permission checks in LiveViews or controllers
- Add
data-confirmattribute for destructive UI actions — client-side confirmation before server round-trip - Test both authorized and unauthorized paths — every
handle_eventthat mutates data needs an authz test proving unauthorized access is rejected - Scope queries to the current user in contexts —
where(user_id: ^user_id)prevents IDOR vulnerabilities
Server-Side Authorization in LiveViews
UI checks prevent accidental clicks. Server checks prevent attacks. You need both.
defmodule MyAppWeb.PostLive.Show do
use MyAppWeb, :live_view
@impl true
def mount(%{"id" => id}, _session, socket) do
post = Blog.get_post!(id)
{:ok, assign(socket, :post, post)}
end
@impl true
def render(assigns) do
~H"""
<h1><%= @post.title %></h1>
<%!-- UI check — hide button if not owner --%>
<%= if @current_scope.user.id == @post.user_id do %>
<.button phx-click="delete" data-confirm="Are you sure?">
Delete
</.button>
<% end %>
"""
end
# Server check — ALWAYS verify ownership
@impl true
def handle_event("delete", _params, socket) do
post = socket.assigns.post
if socket.assigns.current_scope.user.id == post.user_id do
{:ok, _} = Blog.delete_post(post)
{:noreply, push_navigate(socket, to: ~p"/posts")}
else
{:noreply, put_flash(socket, :error, "Not authorized")}
end
end
end
Owner-Only Pattern
The simplest and most common authorization pattern. Extract it for reuse.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 325 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 634892c7368f
phoenix-authorization-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository j-morgan6/elixir-phoenix-guide (159 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,343 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…