Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jackjin1997/ClawForge --skill dddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jackjin1997/ClawForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jackjin1997/clawforge/ddd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jackjin1997/clawforge/ddd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jackjin1997/clawforge/ddd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jackjin1997/clawforge/ddd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jackjin1997/clawforge/ddd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.02310 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00924 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00462 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
ddd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 250 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A b6b50b367cd5
ddd is a skill published in the GitHub repository jackjin1997/ClawForge (13 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 2,310 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
architecture-paradigm-domain-driven
Models a business in its own language. Use when the domain has real business rules to capture.
architecture-patterns
Software architecture patterns and best practices.
code-review-architecture
Architecture-focused code review covering hexagonal boundary violations, DDD anti-patterns, CQRS misuse, and microservices coupling issues. Applied in addition to the language-specific review skill when architecture markers are detected. Invoked when reviewing hexagonal architectures, DDD patterns, or microservices…
ddd-aggregate-modeling
Guides aggregate modeling decisions for DDD services: aggregate root boundaries, child entity vs value object decisions, invariants, snapshot/primitives mapping, specification/criteria usage, and repository contract design. Invoked when the user asks to model or refactor domain entities and aggregate behavior.
improve-codebase-architecture
Use when surfacing architectural friction inside a single EVOKORE bounded context and proposing deepening refactors (shallow modules, leaky seams, low locality) that turn shallow modules into deep ones — informed by ADR-0005 bounded contexts and the project's domain language.
microservice-granularity-optimizer
Right-size microservice boundaries using granularity disintegrators (forces to split: service scope, code volatility, scalability, fault tolerance, security, extensibility) and integrators (forces to combine: database transactions, workflow/choreography coupling, shared code, data relationships). Includes choreography…