Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jaemk/mind --skill recapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jaemk/mindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaemk/mind/recap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaemk/mind/recap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaemk/mind/recap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaemk/mind/recap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaemk/mind/recap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00061 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00024 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
recap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
recap
At the end of a working session, list what was produced and what remains open so the next step is clear. Keep it factual: changes made, tests run, follow-ups.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A d9f4c9dae5e0
recap is a skill published in the GitHub repository jaemk/mind (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 61 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
wttr-weather
Weather via wttr.in GET (no key). Use for weather/forecast; prefer os.http.request.
arkcli-deploy
A deployment workflow for creating an online inference endpoint from an AI model. Creating one is a real account change that can create a billable resource.
jk
Manage Jenkins controllers with jk, including jobs, runs, logs, artifacts, credentials, nodes, queues, and plugins.
scheduling
Scheduling across time zones: confirm times in the attendee's own zone, use IANA zone names, mind DST edges, buffers and calendar etiquette. Use when booking meetings or calls with people in other zones.
ground-state
Before starting any non-trivial implementation, run a pre-flight reconnaissance pass to triangulate git state, project infrastructure, and prior-session memory. Auto-assembles a verified grounding preamble — a session-scoped artifact the orchestrator pastes verbatim into every subsequent sub-agent brief — eliminating…
qa-investigation
Investigate a specific test failure to its root cause and document the why. Detects whether a failing test is flaky (intermittent) or a deterministic bug during reproduction. Use when a test fails and you need the real cause, not just to make it green. Execution layer, not strategy review. Keywords: flaky test…