Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jain777/jobclaw-skills --skill score-fitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jain777/jobclaw-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jain777/jobclaw-skills/score-fit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jain777/jobclaw-skills/score-fit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jain777/jobclaw-skills/score-fit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jain777/jobclaw-skills/score-fit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jain777/jobclaw-skills/score-fit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00868 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
score-fit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
score-fit
Judge a job against the user's profile the way a good recruiter + ATS would, and give a decision — not just a number.
Inputs
- The profile: read
profile/master-profile.md.- Missing → offer a degraded one-shot mode: score against a resume/profile snippet the user
pastes now, and set
profile_missing: truein the sidecar. Suggest/build-profilefor next time. - Stale → if fields the score depends on are marked
[VERIFY], warn in the output and setprofile_stale: true. Never credit[VERIFY]facts toward must-haves.
- Missing → offer a degraded one-shot mode: score against a resume/profile snippet the user
pastes now, and set
- The job: a pasted description, a URL to fetch, or an entry from
jobs/found-<date>.json. Known-info gate (RULES §6): if no job is given inline, readjobs/current.json(the job under work) and use itsjd_text/url— do not re-ask for the JD if it's already captured. After resolving the job, write/refreshjobs/current.json({company, role, url, job_id, jd_text, region, source, captured_at}) sotailor-resume/write-cover-letter/answer-application-questionsreuse it without asking again. Only ask the user for a job if none is supplied andcurrent.jsonis absent.
Method (think like an ATS, then like a hiring manager)
-
Apply work-authorization logic first. Determine the job's country and resolve the applicant's
work_authper../../knowledge/work-authorization.md— it uses the job's region pack, not the applicant's, and returns one ofNON-ISSUE / MINOR-NOTE / MAJOR-FILTER / DISQUALIFIER. Record it aswork_auth_verdict. (E.g. India applicant + India job → NON-ISSUE: do not raise or penalize; weight notice-period/CTC fit instead. The same applicant + a US "no sponsorship" job → MAJOR-FILTER.) -
Extract the job's requirements: hard requirements (must-haves), preferred (nice-to-haves), key skills/keywords, seniority, domain, location/remote, comp if stated.
- AI/ML roles: if the role is AI/ML, detect its archetype per
../../knowledge/ai-roles.md(AI Platform/LLMOps · Agentic · Technical AI PM · Solutions Architect · Forward-Deployed · Transformation). Weight thedomainandmust_havessub-scores toward that archetype's proof points, note it instrengths/gaps, and recordarchetypein the sidecar. Distinguish genuine AI roles from "AI" used only as a buzzword (title filter in ai-roles.md).
- AI/ML roles: if the role is AI/ML, detect its archetype per
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 106 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 99bf19bc175f
score-fit is a skill published in the GitHub repository jain777/jobclaw-skills (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,735 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…