creating-orchestration-packs

creating-orchestration-packs is a skill for Claude Code from jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers. It costs 91 tokens per session (2,328 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for splitting a large software task among cooperating coding agents, using separate roles such as exploring, planning, implementing, reviewing, and verifying.

In plain words
What is it for?
Creating folders of agent instruction files, assigning narrow responsibilities, coordinating parallel work, and defining shared handoff notes.
Why use it?
It keeps each agent focused and makes the information passed between them clear and consistent.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Creating folders of agent instruction files, assigning narrow responsibilities, coordinating parallel work, and defining shared handoff notes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/creating-orchestration-packs
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers --skill creating-orchestration-packs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for creating-orchestration-packs

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/creating-orchestration-packs/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/creating-orchestration-packs)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/creating-orchestration-packs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/creating-orchestration-packs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for creating-orchestration-packs

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/creating-orchestration-packs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/creating-orchestration-packs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 91 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,328 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00091 $0.02328
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.01164
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00466
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00233

Measured 11d ago against content hash 16e08cb23013, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

creating-orchestration-packs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/creating-orchestration-packs/skills/creating-orchestration-packs/SKILL.md · 191 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Creating Orchestration Packs

Use this skill when a job is too big for one custom agent and splitting it into cooperating roles would produce better work rather than just more files.

A pack is a folder of .agent.md files plus a README, living under agent-orchestration/. One agent orchestrates and delegates; the rest do the work and return a structured handoff packet. The orchestrator synthesizes.

The value comes from the same place it comes from in human teams: an agent with a narrow scope and a clear output contract does better work than one asked to do everything. The cost is coordination, and a pack that costs more coordination than it saves is worse than a single good agent.

When to Use

  • a workflow has genuinely distinct phases with different tool needs
  • one agent's instruction file has grown into several unrelated roles
  • explore, plan, implement, review, and verify would each benefit from a fresh, narrow context
  • two branches of work could run in parallel and be merged
  • an existing pack fails npm run lint because a handoff target does not resolve

Operating Principles

  • A role earns its file. Each agent has a scope another agent does not, or it should be merged.
  • The orchestrator delegates and never implements. The moment it writes code, its context fills and the pack collapses into one agent with extra steps.
  • Every handoff target resolves. handoffs[].agent and agents[] entries must exactly match a name: in the same pack. CI enforces this.
  • Tools are granted per role, minimally. An explorer that cannot write files cannot accidentally write files.
  • One output contract, shared by every agent. Mixed return shapes make the orchestrator's synthesis unreliable.
  • Names are unique across packs, because users install more than one.

Workflow

Phase 0: Check that a pack is the right shape

A pack is justified when at least two of these hold:

  • the phases need different tools, and granting the union to one agent would be over-privileged
  • a phase benefits from a fresh context rather than one carrying everything before it
  • two phases could genuinely run in parallel
  • a review step is more useful when it did not write the thing it reviews
  • the workflow is long enough that one agent would lose the early instructions by the end

Read the full file on GitHub · 191 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 191 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 16e08cb23013

Subscribe to this mod's changes

creating-orchestration-packs is a skill published in the GitHub repository jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers (113 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 2,328 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.