Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jamescazzetta/moire --skill moire-parallelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jamescazzetta/moireWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamescazzetta/moire/moire-parallel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamescazzetta/moire/moire-parallel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamescazzetta/moire/moire-parallel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamescazzetta/moire/moire-parallel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamescazzetta/moire/moire-parallel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01360 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
moire-parallel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run N agents at once, each in its own git worktree, with moire reporting when any
two of them are about to break each other.
Before anything: should this be parallel at all?
Decomposition is a judgement call and it is yours (or the user's) to make — moire
has no opinion about it and will not help.
Parallelise when the work splits into pieces that touch mostly different parts of the codebase, and each piece is independently verifiable.
Do not parallelise when the pieces share a core abstraction, or when one must land before another can be written. Say so and work sequentially instead. Splitting tightly coupled work across agents produces collisions faster than any tool can report them, and serial execution is a legitimate answer, not a failure.
If unsure, prefer fewer agents. Three is usually plenty; the coordination cost grows with every additional one.
Setup
moire init-swarm --agents 3
This creates ../<repo>-agent-1, -2, -3, installs the binary and git hooks into
.git/ (shared by every worktree), places the skills, and runs doctor. It is
idempotent and --dry-run shows the plan without touching anything.
Each worktree is tracked files only. Install dependencies in each one separately —
do not symlink a shared node_modules, .venv, or vendor across worktrees to
skip the step. Concurrent agents would then be mutating each other's dependencies,
which is exactly the class of interference moire exists to detect.
Observing a peer writes that peer's untracked, non-gitignored files into the
repository's shared object store, where they persist refless until git's housekeeping
prunes them. Gitignored files are never captured, so make sure .env*, credentials
and key material are gitignored before dispatching a swarm. The README section "What
observation writes, and where" has the detail.
If you want the optional semantic check (moire verify), configure its checker
once, before dispatching anyone. The default checker reads Python only; on any
other repository it examines nothing and says so. The measured base rate of the
failure verify looks for — a textually clean merge that is semantically broken —
is 0 of 672 audited co-active agent PR pairs (docs/MEASUREMENTS.md), which is
why verify is optional rather than wired into any hook.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 123 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A dcc1564c20e7
moire-parallel is a skill published in the GitHub repository jamescazzetta/moire (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,360 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-framework-py-release
Use when cutting a Python release for the microsoft/agent-framework monorepo. Triggers on "bump py versions", "cut a python release", "prepare release PR for python", "release py packages", "bump python to X.Y.Z", or similar requests to bump Python package versions and prepare a release PR. Handles all four lifecycle…
github
Interact with GitHub (issues, PRs, repos, releases) using the gh CLI. Use when asked to read or write GitHub state — open an issue, fetch PR diff, comment, list runs, etc.
artifact-metadata
Manage artifact metadata, versioning, ownership, and review history across the SDLC lifecycle.
commit-and-push
Create a well-formatted git commit and push to remote repository.
customize-contribute-back
Contribute a user's AIWG customization back upstream as a PR — reviews for general applicability, creates branch, opens PR.
customize-setup
Set up personal AIWG customization mode from a local clone or fork — makes your clone the live global AIWG instance so edits go live immediately.