Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jamesyang124/agent-skills --skill ado-pr-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jamesyang124/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamesyang124/agent-skills/ado-pr-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamesyang124/agent-skills/ado-pr-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamesyang124/agent-skills/ado-pr-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamesyang124/agent-skills/ado-pr-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamesyang124/agent-skills/ado-pr-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00130 | $0.05121 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00065 | $0.02560 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00512 |
Grade A, and why
ado-pr-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mattpocock/skills/main/skills/engineering/diagnose/SKILL.md \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 503 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Azure DevOps PR Code Review
⚙️ Required: install the diagnose skill
Install diagnose globally for your agent once, then it is available in all projects.
Claude (global)
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/diagnose
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mattpocock/skills/main/skills/engineering/diagnose/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.claude/skills/diagnose/SKILL.md
# Then add to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md:
# - **diagnose** (`~/.claude/skills/diagnose/SKILL.md`) — bug diagnosis loop
GitHub Copilot (global)
mkdir -p ~/.copilot/skills/diagnose
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mattpocock/skills/main/skills/engineering/diagnose/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.copilot/skills/diagnose/SKILL.md
# Then reference it from your global Copilot instructions file.
Via agent-settings import-skills.sh (project-local)
# If using this agent-settings repo, import it into a project:
.agent-settings/skills/import-skills.sh claude diagnose # Claude / Copilot
The diagnose skill must be visible to your agent before proceeding.
Security-focused PR review that posts inline LOC-level comments on the diff.
Arguments
| Token | Meaning |
|---|---|
| an Azure DevOps PR URL | required — the PR to review; parsed in Step 1 |
No URL → ask for one before doing anything else.
Step 1 — Parse the PR URL
Extract from the URL:
org— the Azure DevOps organizationproject— the team projectrepo— the repository nameprId— the pull request ID (integer)
URL patterns:
https://dev.azure.com/{org}/{project}/_git/{repo}/pullrequest/{prId}
https://{org}.visualstudio.com/{project}/_git/{repo}/pullrequest/{prId}
Step 2 — Fetch PR metadata and changed files
- Call
mcp_azure_devops__repo_get_pull_request_by_idwith{org},{project},{repo},{prId} - Call
mcp_azure_devops__repo_get_pull_request_changesto get the list of changed files and their diffs - For each changed file, call
mcp_azure_devops__repo_get_file_contentto get the full file content at the PR's source branch
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 503 lines · 130 tokens per session scan A b0cd008bd706
ado-pr-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jamesyang124/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 130 tokens to every session and 5,121 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…