Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills --skill code-review-cligit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/code-review-cli)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/code-review-cli"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/code-review-cli/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/code-review-cli"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills/code-review-cli.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.01211 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00484 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-cli scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CLI Application Code Review Patterns
Stack-specific rules loaded by dh:code-reviewer when CLI entrypoints are detected (argparse, click, typer, commander.js, or similar argument parsing libraries).
Load /dh:review-principles before applying these checks. Establish the command's supported
platforms and human/machine output contracts before prescribing an exact flag or exit code.
Exit Codes
- Verify exit status distinguishes success from failure under the documented command contract, including partial-success or best-effort modes where supported.
- Report success status after a required operation failed when callers cannot detect that failure; distinguish an overall failure from a documented recoverable warning.
- Common conventions:
1for general errors,2for usage/argument errors,3+for application-specific codes documented in--help - Verify fatal paths reach a non-zero exit through the framework or explicit exit handling; printing to stderr alone is not a failure signal for a caller that checks exit status.
# WRONG: exits 0 even on error
def main():
try:
run()
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
# implicit exit 0
# RIGHT: non-zero on error
def main():
try:
run()
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
Help and Version Flags
- Check that supported help/version interfaces are discoverable and usable by their intended callers; use
--helpand--versionas conventions for new human-facing commands. - Verify help describes the actual options and examples, and version output agrees with the installed/distributed package's version source.
- Help text must be consistent with actual behavior — stale help text is a blocking finding
- Supported help and version requests must report success when they complete successfully.
stdin / stdout / stderr Separation
- Progress indicators, status messages, and diagnostic output go to
stderr - Data output (results to be piped or redirected) goes to
stdout - Mixing diagnostic messages into
stdoutbreaks pipe usage — this is a blocking finding for tools that produce structured output - Error messages go to
stderrwith a non-zero exit code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -1 lines 057c5ba18095
- 15d ago Changed · +5 lines 710a9f47da79
- 1mo ago First seen · 116 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A a3f0bc87daa5
code-review-cli is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills (67 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,211 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
sync-bridge
Reviews and guides Chromium Sync Model API (DataTypeSyncBridge) implementations, including DataTypeStore persistence and forwards/backwards compatibility for sync specifics. Use when implementing or reviewing a DataTypeSyncBridge subclass, DataTypeStore usage, sync metadata persistence, conflict resolution, or…
sync-model-processor
Reviews changes to Chromium Sync model internals in components/sync/model/, including ClientTagBasedDataTypeProcessor, ClientTagBasedRemoteUpdateHandler, ProcessorEntity, ProcessorEntityMetadata, and ProcessorEntityTracker. Use when modifying or reviewing processor state transitions, entity metadata tracking, conflict…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
gsd-ns-review
Invoke this Pi skill with /skill:gsd-ns-review.
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…