Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill click-path-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/click-path-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/click-path-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/click-path-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/click-path-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/click-path-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.01951 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00780 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
click-path-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to click-path-audit — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 245 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/click-path-audit — Behavioural Flow Audit
Find bugs that static code reading misses: state interaction side effects, race conditions between sequential calls, and handlers that silently undo each other.
The Problem This Solves
Traditional debugging checks:
- Does the function exist? (missing wiring)
- Does it crash? (runtime errors)
- Does it return the right type? (data flow)
But it does NOT check:
- Does the final UI state match what the button label promises?
- Does function B silently undo what function A just did?
- Does shared state (Zustand/Redux/context) have side effects that cancel the intended action?
Real example: A "New Email" button called setComposeMode(true) then selectThread(null). Both worked individually. But selectThread had a side effect resetting composeMode: false. The button did nothing. 54 bugs were found by systematic debugging — this one was missed.
How It Works
For EVERY interactive touchpoint in the target area:
1. IDENTIFY the handler (onClick, onSubmit, onChange, etc.)
2. TRACE every function call in the handler, IN ORDER
3. For EACH function call:
a. What state does it READ?
b. What state does it WRITE?
c. Does it have SIDE EFFECTS on shared state?
d. Does it reset/clear any state as a side effect?
4. CHECK: Does any later call UNDO a state change from an earlier call?
5. CHECK: Is the FINAL state what the user expects from the button label?
6. CHECK: Are there race conditions (async calls that resolve in wrong order)?
Execution Steps
Step 1: Map State Stores
Before auditing any touchpoint, build a side-effect map of every state store action:
For each Zustand store / React context in scope:
For each action/setter:
- What fields does it set?
- Does it RESET other fields as a side effect?
- Document: actionName → {sets: [...], resets: [...]}
This is the critical reference. The "New Email" bug was invisible without knowing that selectThread resets composeMode.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 245 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 9455e941c680
click-path-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (91 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,951 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to click-path-audit, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
google-cloud-storage-diagnostic
Troubleshoots and diagnoses Google Cloud Storage (GCS) errors, permission denials, and access control issues. Use when a user encounters a 403 Permission Denied error on a Google Cloud bucket or object, or needs help diagnosing and resolving GCS IAM bindings, ACLs, UBLA, or service agent configurations.
discord-troubleshooting
Troubleshoots and resolves gemini-discord bot connection, gateway issues (e.g. fatal disconnects 4014, 4004), and port conflicts. Ensures the bot gets online and operational by running loops to verify success.
debug-assistant
Systematic debugging assistant that helps identify and fix bugs through structured analysis, hypothesis testing, and root cause identification. Use when facing errors, unexpected behavior, or mysterious bugs.
quick-fix
Apply a minimal, targeted fix to a specific bug or issue. Focused on speed and precision - locate the problem, make the smallest correct change, and verify. Not a planning workflow; use for small fixes, patches, and hotfixes.
bug-investigator
Expert guidance for systematic bug hunting, root-cause analysis, and regression testing. Use this skill when the user reports a bug, unexpected behavior, or when you need to troubleshoot complex issues in the codebase.
troubleshooter
Specialized in system-wide troubleshooting using metrics and logs.