Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loopnpx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill continuous-agent-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00261 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
continuous-agent-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to continuous-agent-loop — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Continuous Agent Loop
This is the v1.8+ canonical loop skill name. It supersedes autonomous-loops while keeping compatibility for one release.
Loop Selection Flow
Start
|
+-- Need strict CI/PR control? -- yes --> continuous-pr
|
+-- Need RFC decomposition? -- yes --> rfc-dag
|
+-- Need exploratory parallel generation? -- yes --> infinite
|
+-- default --> sequential
Combined Pattern
Recommended production stack:
- RFC decomposition (
ralphinho-rfc-pipeline) - quality gates (
plankton-code-quality+/egc-quality-gate) - eval loop (
eval-harness) - session persistence (
nanoclaw-repl)
Failure Modes
- loop churn without measurable progress
- repeated retries with same root cause
- merge queue stalls
- cost drift from unbounded escalation
Recovery
- freeze loop
- run
/egc-harness-audit - reduce scope to failing unit
- replay with explicit acceptance criteria
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 46 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c3892de0588b
continuous-agent-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (87 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 261 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to continuous-agent-loop, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd-full-cycle
Group skill: Test-Driven Development full cycle — plan, RED phase, GREEN phase, REFACTOR phase, E2E tests, coverage, and review.
autonomous-tdd-debugger
Empowers the agent to autonomously run tests, read terminal stack traces, and self-heal code until tests pass. Transforms the agent from a passive coder to an active CI pipeline debugger.
tdd-implement
Implements a feature or fix using Test-Driven Development — write failing tests first, then implement just enough to make them pass, then refactor. Keeps tests focused on acceptance criteria rather than implementation details. Use when building something new with TDD, or when the user wants to start from tests rather…
review-work
Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE after…
visual-qa
Rigorous visual QA for any UI you built or changed, across BOTH web/page UIs and TUI/terminal UIs. MUST USE after building or changing any UI to verify it visually before declaring it done. Captures objective reference evidence with a bundled diff script (image-diff for screenshots, tui-check for terminal captures)…
test-generation
Generate comprehensive tests for code including unit tests, integration tests, and edge case coverage. Analyzes code to identify testable units and generates tests matching the project's testing framework and conventions.