Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill continuous-agent-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/continuous-agent-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00261 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00104 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
continuous-agent-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to continuous-agent-loop — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Continuous Agent Loop
This is the v1.8+ canonical loop skill name. It supersedes autonomous-loops while keeping compatibility for one release.
Loop Selection Flow
Start
|
+-- Need strict CI/PR control? -- yes --> continuous-pr
|
+-- Need RFC decomposition? -- yes --> rfc-dag
|
+-- Need exploratory parallel generation? -- yes --> infinite
|
+-- default --> sequential
Combined Pattern
Recommended production stack:
- RFC decomposition (
ralphinho-rfc-pipeline) - quality gates (
plankton-code-quality+/egc-quality-gate) - eval loop (
eval-harness) - session persistence (
nanoclaw-repl)
Failure Modes
- loop churn without measurable progress
- repeated retries with same root cause
- merge queue stalls
- cost drift from unbounded escalation
Recovery
- freeze loop
- run
/egc-harness-audit - reduce scope to failing unit
- replay with explicit acceptance criteria
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c3892de0588b
continuous-agent-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (91 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 261 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to continuous-agent-loop, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
redteam-exploit-validation
Focused workflow for validating exploitability safely and turning candidate issues into reproducible, bounded proof.
tdd-full-cycle
Group skill: Test-Driven Development full cycle — plan, RED phase, GREEN phase, REFACTOR phase, E2E tests, coverage, and review.
test-driven-development
Instructions for test-driven development, or TDD: writing a failing test first, then the smallest code that makes it pass, followed by cleanup.
tdd-prd
Generates comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) with BDD Given-When-Then acceptance scenarios, success metrics, and manages CONTEXT.md.
polya-fix
Phase 5 of the Pólya Heuristic Coder: First-Principles Bug Remediation, Seam Tracing, Bisection Search (O(log n)), Failing Reproduction Tests, and Incubation Circuit-Breaker Gate (docs/bug-reports/{slug}-bugfix.md).
tdd
Test-driven development, from unit to end-to-end tests. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration or end-to-end tests (Playwright, Cypress). Don't use to backfill tests on existing code (/refactor) or diagnose an unknown bug (/debug).