Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/councilnpx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill councilgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/council)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/council.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01392 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00696 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
council scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to council — 31 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 204 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Council
Convene four advisors for ambiguous decisions:
- the in-context Gemini voice
- a Skeptic subagent
- a Pragmatist subagent
- a Critic subagent
This is for decision-making under ambiguity, not code review, implementation planning, or architecture design.
When to Use
Use council when:
- a decision has multiple credible paths and no obvious winner
- you need explicit tradeoff surfacing
- the user asks for second opinions, dissent, or multiple perspectives
- conversational anchoring is a real risk
- a go / no-go call would benefit from adversarial challenge
Examples:
- monorepo vs polyrepo
- ship now vs hold for polish
- feature flag vs full rollout
- simplify scope vs keep strategic breadth
When NOT to Use
| Instead of council | Use |
|---|---|
| Verifying whether output is correct | santa-method |
| Breaking a feature into implementation steps | planner |
| Designing system architecture | architect |
| Reviewing code for bugs or security | code-reviewer or santa-method |
| Straight factual questions | just answer directly |
| Obvious execution tasks | just do the task |
Roles
| Voice | Lens |
|---|---|
| Architect | correctness, maintainability, long-term implications |
| Skeptic | premise challenge, simplification, assumption breaking |
| Pragmatist | shipping speed, user impact, operational reality |
| Critic | edge cases, downside risk, failure modes |
The three external voices should be launched as fresh subagents with only the question and relevant context, not the full ongoing conversation. That is the anti-anchoring mechanism.
Workflow
1. Extract the real question
Reduce the decision to one explicit prompt:
- what are we deciding?
- what constraints matter?
- what counts as success?
If the question is vague, ask one clarifying question before convening the council.
2. Gather only the necessary context
If the decision is codebase-specific:
- collect the relevant files, snippets, issue text, or metrics
- keep it compact
- include only the context needed to make the decision
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 204 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A cb217bae3383
council is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (87 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,392 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to council, differing in 31 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
codeck
Route explicit requests from a host coding agent to one or more locally configured AI executors through Codeck, attach Markdown or other project files, moderate cross-model consultation, expose disagreements, and synthesize traceable results. Use when the user explicitly names Codeck or asks to consult, compare, or…
scan
Scan your AI coding tool ecosystem — Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Antigravity (Desktop, CLI, IDE), Continue, Windsurf, JetBrains AI, OpenCode. Produces a maturity score, advisory recommendations, and optionally generates reusable SKILL.md files from your conversation patterns. Use when the user asks to audit their…
review-work
Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE after…
image-prompt
막연한 요청을 gpt-image-2(Codex $imagegen) 완성 프롬프트로 컴파일하는 스킬. 검증된 규칙 — 티어드 네거티브(기본 전부 긍정형+극소수 화이트리스트 2종), 앞 브래킷 금지·끝 AR 토큰만, 장비는 결과로 환원, HEX 명시, 1행=1컷, 사이즈락 6종, C1C12 플레이북, 화보 Format B(플랫 콤마형), 시네마틱 키아트(C11·그림자서사 shadownarrative), 프레젠테이션/슬라이드 덱(C12), 룩 프리셋 9종(홍대 인디 L9 포함), 홍보판촉물 그래픽 문법 P1P8(타이포-마스크·타이포-환경·오클루전·컬러블로킹 캠페인·메타…
archify
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and…
visual-qa
Rigorous visual QA for any UI you built or changed, across BOTH web/page UIs and TUI/terminal UIs. MUST USE after building or changing any UI to verify it visually before declaring it done. Captures objective reference evidence with a bundled diff script (image-diff for screenshots, tui-check for terminal captures)…