Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill django-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/django-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/django-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/django-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/django-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/django-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.03612 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01445 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00722 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00361 |
Grade A, and why
django-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to django-security — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 593 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Django Security Best Practices
Comprehensive security guidelines for Django applications to protect against common vulnerabilities.
When to Use
- Setting up Django authentication and authorization
- Implementing user permissions and roles
- Configuring production security settings
- Reviewing Django application for security issues
- Deploying Django applications to production
Core Security Settings
Production Settings Configuration
# settings/production.py
import os
DEBUG = False # CRITICAL: Never use True in production
ALLOWED_HOSTS = os.environ.get('ALLOWED_HOSTS', '').split(',')
# Security headers
SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT = True
SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = True
CSRF_COOKIE_SECURE = True
SECURE_HSTS_SECONDS = 31536000 # 1 year
SECURE_HSTS_INCLUDE_SUBDOMAINS = True
SECURE_HSTS_PRELOAD = True
SECURE_CONTENT_TYPE_NOSNIFF = True
SECURE_BROWSER_XSS_FILTER = True
X_FRAME_OPTIONS = 'DENY'
# HTTPS and Cookies
SESSION_COOKIE_HTTPONLY = True
CSRF_COOKIE_HTTPONLY = True
SESSION_COOKIE_SAMESITE = 'Lax'
CSRF_COOKIE_SAMESITE = 'Lax'
# Secret key (must be set via environment variable)
SECRET_KEY = os.environ.get('DJANGO_SECRET_KEY')
if not SECRET_KEY:
raise ImproperlyConfigured('DJANGO_SECRET_KEY environment variable is required')
# Password validation
AUTH_PASSWORD_VALIDATORS = [
{
'NAME': 'django.contrib.auth.password_validation.UserAttributeSimilarityValidator',
},
{
'NAME': 'django.contrib.auth.password_validation.MinimumLengthValidator',
'OPTIONS': {
'min_length': 12,
}
},
{
'NAME': 'django.contrib.auth.password_validation.CommonPasswordValidator',
},
{
'NAME': 'django.contrib.auth.password_validation.NumericPasswordValidator',
},
]
Authentication
Custom User Model
# apps/users/models.py
from django.contrib.auth.models import AbstractUser
from django.db import models
class User(AbstractUser):
"""Custom user model for better security."""
email = models.EmailField(unique=True)
phone = models.CharField(max_length=20, blank=True)
USERNAME_FIELD = 'email' # Use email as username
REQUIRED_FIELDS = ['username']
class Meta:
db_table = 'users'
verbose_name = 'User'
verbose_name_plural = 'Users'
def __str__(self):
return self.email
# settings/base.py
AUTH_USER_MODEL = 'users.User'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 593 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 9a9c29150b12
django-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (91 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 3,612 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to django-security, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
redteam
Expertise in offensive security research, vulnerability analysis, CMS-focused application testing, and red team operations.
redteam-cms
Focused methodology for authorized CMS fingerprinting, component inventory, misconfiguration review, and vulnerability validation.
redteam-exploit-validation
Focused workflow for validating exploitability safely and turning candidate issues into reproducible, bounded proof.
redteam-recon
Focused reconnaissance workflow for authorized security assessments, bug bounty triage, lab targets, and CTF infrastructure.
redteam-reporting
Focused reporting workflow for converting verified red-team work into clear, reproducible assessment artifacts.
redteam-source-audit
Focused source-code security review workflow for web applications, CMS extensions, APIs, and supporting services.